Hulless barley as an alternative energy source for growing-finishing pigs on growth performance, carcass quality, and nutrient digestibility

被引:8
作者
Wu, JF [1 ]
Cheng, CS [1 ]
Yu, IT [1 ]
Hsyu, JN [1 ]
机构
[1] Pig Res inst, Dept Reprod Management, Miaoli, Taiwan
来源
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE | 2000年 / 65卷 / 1-2期
关键词
hulless barley; growth; carcass trait; digestibility; swine;
D O I
10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00168-2
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
One feeding trial and one digestion trial were conducted to compare hulless barley and corn in terms of their effects on pig performance, carcass traits, and nutrient digestibility. In the feeding trial, 32 crossbred pigs (Duroc x Landrace X Yorkshire), averaging 22.3 kg each, were randomly assigned to two treatments as follows: (1) a corn-soybean meal control diet, and (2) all the corn of the control diet replaced by hulless barley. In the digestion trial, eight crossbred gilts (Duroc X Landrace X Yorkshire), averaging 65.08 kg, were used to determine the digestibility of the diets. In the feeding trial, the average daily gain (ADG) of pigs fed the hulless barley diet was significantly higher than that of pigs fed the corn diet during the grower period, but the pigs fed the hulless barley diet were not significantly different in ADG from the pigs fed the corn diet during the finisher and overall periods. The daily feed intake of pigs fed the hulless barley diet was not significantly different from that of pigs fed the corn diet during the grower, finisher, and overall periods. The feed-to-gain ratio of pigs fed the hulless barley diet was not significantly different from that of pigs fed the com diet during the grower period, but the pigs fed the hulless barley diet required less feed per unit of gain than those fed the corn diet during the finisher and overall periods. The dressing percentage, carcass length, mean backfat thickness, and loin eye area of pigs fed the hulless barley diet were not significantly different from those of pigs fed the corn diet. In the digestion trial, the apparent digestion coefficients of dry matter and energy of pigs fed the hulless barley diet were not significantly different from those of pigs fed the corn diet. The coefficient for nitrogen tended to be lower for hulless barley than for corn (P < 0.07). From these results, hulless barley is concluded to be a potential alternative energy source for use in swine diets. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 160
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
AHERNE FX, 1986, 65 ANN FEEDERS DAY R, P107
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1988, NUTR REQ SWIN, V9th
[3]  
Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 1984, OFF METH AN
[4]  
BEAMES R M, 1969, Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, V9, P594, DOI 10.1071/EA9690594
[5]   FACTORS AFFECTING THE DIGESTIBILITY BY PIGS OF ENERGY AND PROTEIN IN WHEAT, BARLEY AND SORGHUM DIETS SUPPLEMENTED WITH CANOLA-MEAL [J].
BELL, JM ;
KEITH, MO .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1989, 24 (3-4) :253-265
[6]   A SURVEY OF VARIATION IN THE CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION OF COMMERCIAL CANOLA-MEAL PRODUCED IN WESTERN CANADIAN CRUSHING PLANTS [J].
BELL, JM ;
KEITH, MO .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1991, 71 (02) :469-480
[7]   EFFECTS OF ADDING BARLEY HULLS AND LINSEED MEAL TO WHEAT AND HULLESS BARLEY DIETS FED TO GROWING PIGS [J].
BELL, JM ;
KEITH, MO .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 45 (02) :177-191
[8]   EFFECTS OF COMBINATIONS OF WHEAT, CORN OR HULLESS BARLEY WITH HULLED BARLEY SUPPLEMENTED WITH SOYBEAN-MEAL OR CANOLA-MEAL ON GROWTH-RATE, EFFICIENCY OF FEED-UTILIZATION AND CARCASS QUALITY OF MARKET PIGS [J].
BELL, JM ;
KEITH, MO .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 44 (1-2) :129-150
[9]   EFFECT OF HULL AND PROTEIN CONTENTS OF BARLEY ON PROTEIN AND ENERGY DIGESTIBILITY AND FEEDING VALUE FOR PIGS [J].
BELL, JM ;
SHIRES, A ;
KEITH, MO .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1983, 63 (01) :201-211
[10]   ENERGY AND PROTEIN DIGESTIBILITIES OF HULLED AND HULLESS BARLEY DETERMINED BY SWINE-FEEDING [J].
BHATTY, RS ;
CHRISTISON, GI ;
ROSSNAGEL, BG .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1979, 59 (03) :585-588