Evaluation of Emergency Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Obstructing Ureteral Stones

被引:18
作者
Ghalayini, Ibrahim F. [1 ]
Al-Ghazo, Mohammed A. [1 ]
Khader, Yousef S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Med, King Ahdullah Univ Hosp, Irbid, Jordan
来源
INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL | 2008年 / 34卷 / 04期
关键词
extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy; ureteral calculi; emergency; treatment outcome;
D O I
10.1590/S1677-55382008000400005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose To assess the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) for ureteral calculi during acute renal colic Materials and Methods From January 2002 to March 2007, 108 patients were treated by ESWL for obstructing ureteral stones causing acute renal colic. ESWL was performed within 24 hours of the onset of renal colic. Results. The mean age of the patients was 39 5 years (11-72 years) Male/female ratio was 85/23 Mean stone size was 8 45 mm (4-20 mm) They were located in the pelvic (n = 53), iliac (n = 28) or lumbar (n = 27) region Fragmentation after a single session was complete in 56 patients (52%), incomplete in 28 (26%), and absent in 24 (22%) Patients presenting incomplete fragmentation underwent a second (n = 28) or even a third session (n = 11) Of the 24 patients in whom ESWL had no impact on the stone, 21 underwent ureteroscopy, and in one case open ureterolithotomy for a patient with a hard 17 mm stone, while spontaneous passage occurred in two patients with small stones. Conclusion Emergency ESWL for obstructing ureteral stones has a satisfactory success rate and very low morbidity The stone-free rate of retreating ureteral calculi with ESWL decreases significantly after failed initial treatment. Stone size may be the main predictive factor for retreatment. We suggest that no more than 3 treatments should be given for a particular stone due to minimal improvement in the subsequent cumulative treatment success rate
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 440
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Management of ureteric stones [J].
Anagnostou, T ;
Tolley, D .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2004, 45 (06) :714-721
[2]   Therapeutic options in lithiasis of the lumbar ureter [J].
Arrabal-Martín, M ;
Pareja-Vilches, M ;
Gutiérrez-Tejero, F ;
Miján-Ortiz, JL ;
Palao-Yago, F ;
Zuluaga-Gómez, A .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2003, 43 (05) :556-563
[3]   THE ROLE OF OPEN STONE SURGERY SINCE EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY [J].
ASSIMOS, DG ;
BOYCE, WH ;
HARRISON, LH ;
MCCULLOUGH, DL ;
KROOVAND, RL ;
SWEAT, KR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 142 (02) :263-267
[4]   INSITU EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY FOR OBSTRUCTING URETERAL STONES WITH ACUTE RENAL COLIC [J].
CASS, AS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 148 (06) :1786-1787
[5]   Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT [J].
Coll, DM ;
Varanelli, MJ ;
Smith, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 178 (01) :101-103
[6]   Management and follow-up of impacted ureteral stones [J].
Deliveliotis, C ;
Chrisofos, M ;
Albanis, S ;
Serafetinides, E ;
Varkarakis, J ;
Protogerou, V .
UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2003, 70 (04) :269-272
[7]  
Devarajan R, 1998, BRIT J UROL, V82, P342
[8]   In situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for acute renal colic due to obstructing ureteral stones [J].
Doublet, JD ;
Tchala, K ;
Tligui, M ;
Ciofu, C ;
Gattegno, B ;
Thibault, P .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 1997, 31 (02) :137-139
[9]  
Enguita CG, 2000, ACTAS UROL ESP, V24, P721
[10]   Management of ureteric stones: issues and controversies [J].
Gettman, MT ;
Segura, JW .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 95 :85-93