The secondary copulatory organ in female ground weta (Hemiandrus pallitarsis, Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae):: a sexually selected device in females?

被引:12
作者
Gwynne, DT [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Zool, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada
关键词
Ensifera; genitalia; nuptial gifts; secondary sexual organs; sexual dimorphism;
D O I
10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00510.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Secondary sexual devices in female insects, primarily abdominal modifications, appear to function as a means of thwarting coercive mating attempts by males or are, in rare cases, sexually selected adaptations. Female ground weta, Hemiandrus pallitarsis (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae), have an elaborate elbowed device on the underside of the mid-abdomen. Experimental removal of this accessory organ shows that it does not increase the probability of mating as predicted by the thwart-copulation hypothesis. Instead, removal prevents copulation, thus demonstrating that it is a secondary copulatory device. The male attaches to the organ both at the beginning of copulation and at the end, when he positions himself to adhere a spermatophylax food gift onto the mid-ventral region of his mate. The female accessory organ does not function to manipulate eggs or larvae (females provide care to their single clutch of offspring) and is unlikely to be a copulatory structure that prevents hybridization. The great extent of the modification of the ventral abdominal segments of H. pallitarsis females compared to other Hemiandrus species is consistent with a history of sexual selection on the accessory organ. Taken together, these results and the finding that the length of the accessory organ of H. pallitarsis correlates with female fecundity, suggest that this structure evolved under sexual selection to acquire nuptial gifts from males. (c) 2005 The Linnean Society of London.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 469
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Alexander R. D., 1967, MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC, V133, P1
[2]   Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects [J].
Arnqvist, G ;
Rowe, L .
NATURE, 2002, 415 (6873) :787-789
[3]  
Arnqvist G, 1999, EVOLUTION, V53, P147, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05340.x
[4]   Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection [J].
Arnqvist, G .
NATURE, 1998, 393 (6687) :784-786
[5]   The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence [J].
Bonduriansky, R .
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2001, 76 (03) :305-339
[6]  
BUSSIERE LF, 2003, THESIS U TORONTO TOR
[7]   Sexual conflict [J].
Chapman, T ;
Arnqvist, G ;
Bangham, J ;
Rowe, L .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2003, 18 (01) :41-47
[8]   Sex roles and sexual selection [J].
Cunningham, EJA ;
Birkhead, TR .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1998, 56 :1311-1321
[9]  
Darwin C., 1871, P423
[10]  
Darwin C., 2019, ORIGIN SPECIES MEANS