Radical or Not-So-Radical Prostatectomy: Do Surgical Margins Matter?

被引:11
作者
Grypari, Ioanna Maria [1 ]
Zolota, Vasiliki [1 ]
Tzelepi, Vasiliki [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Patras, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Patras 26504, Greece
关键词
prostate cancer; margins of resection; radical prostatectomy; prognosis; pathology; ISUP CONSENSUS CONFERENCE; PRIMARY GLEASON GRADE; INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; POSITIVE MARGINS; CANCER; IMPACT; RADIOTHERAPY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.3390/cancers14010013
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Prostate cancer is the second most common noncutaneous malignancy in men. Prostatectomy is a commonly used treatment modality for selected patients. The prostate's ill-defined borders and its vicinity with vital structures complicate the wide excision of the organ, resulting in positive margins of resection. Neoplastic infiltration of margins of resection in prostatectomy specimens affects patients' prognosis. The surgical technique and surgeons' expertise affect the incidence of margin positivity. The location and the extent of positive margins diversify the risk of recurrence, with basal infiltration and multifocal foci of positive margins behaving more aggressively. Pathologists are encouraged to thoroughly report the status of margins of resection, as they provide important information for patients' prognosis and enable the clinician to decide upon the most appropriate subsequent therapeutic steps. Prostate cancer is the second most common malignancy in men, and prostatectomy is the treatment of choice for most patients with at least low risk of progression. The presence of positive margins in the radical prostatectomy specimen is considered an adverse pathologic feature, and may prompt additional therapeutic intervention in the patients. The absence of a distinct capsule around the prostate and intraoperative manipulations that aim to minimize postoperative adverse effects, complicate its wide removal. Proper handling of the specimen during the gross processing is essential for accurate determination of the status of margins or resection. Positive margins, defined as the presence of neoplastic glands in the highlighted-with-ink margin of resection, range from 6-38%. The surgical technique, surgeon's expertise and tumor (i.e., grade and stage) and patients' (i.e., BMI) characteristics affect the rate of margin positivity. Extensive or multifocal and nonanterior/nonapical positive margins are linked with higher recurrence rates, especially in organ-confined disease, underscoring the need for treating these patients more aggressively. In summary, detailed description of the status of the margins should be performed in every pathology report to determine patients' prognosis and the most appropriate therapeutic plan.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Impact of Positive Surgical Margins After Radical Prostatectomy Differs by Disease Risk Group [J].
Alkhateeb, Sultan ;
Alibhai, Shabbir ;
Fleshner, Neil ;
Finelli, Antonio ;
Jewett, Michael ;
Zlotta, Alexandre ;
Nesbitt, Michael ;
Lockwood, Gina ;
Trachtenberg, John .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (01) :145-150
[2]  
Aparicio A, 2014, ONCOLOGY-NY, V28, P831
[3]   THE PROSTATIC CAPSULE - DOES IT EXIST - ITS IMPORTANCE IN THE STAGING AND TREATMENT OF PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA [J].
AYALA, AG ;
RO, JY ;
BABAIAN, R ;
TRONCOSO, P ;
GRIGNON, DJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1989, 13 (01) :21-27
[4]   Factors affecting erectile function after radical retropubic prostatectomy: results from 1620 consecutive patients [J].
Ayyathurai, Rajinikanth ;
Manoharan, Murugesan ;
Nieder, Alan M. ;
Kava, Bruce ;
Soloway, Mark S. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 101 (07) :833-836
[5]   Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy [J].
Blute, ML ;
Bostwick, DG ;
Bergstralh, EJ ;
Slezak, JM ;
Martin, SK ;
Amling, CL ;
Zincke, H .
UROLOGY, 1997, 50 (05) :733-739
[6]   The Gleason Score of Tumor at the Margin in Radical Prostatectomy is Predictive of Biochemical Recurrence [J].
Cao, Dengfeng ;
Kibel, Adam S. ;
Gao, Feng ;
Tao, Yu ;
Humphrey, Peter A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2010, 34 (07) :994-1001
[7]   Cancer Control and Functional Outcomes of Salvage Radical Prostatectomy for Radiation-recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature [J].
Chade, Daher C. ;
Eastham, James ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Hu, Jim C. ;
Karnes, R. Jeffrey ;
Klotz, Laurence ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
van Poppel, Hendrik ;
Scardino, Peter T. ;
Shariat, Shahrokh F. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (05) :961-971
[8]   Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality [J].
Chalfin, Heather J. ;
Dinizo, Michael ;
Trock, Bruce J. ;
Feng, Zhaoyong ;
Partin, Alan W. ;
Walsh, Patrick C. ;
Humphreys, Elizabeth ;
Han, Misop .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (11) :1684-1689
[9]   Closest distance between tumor and resection margin in radical prostatectomy specimens - Lack of prognostic significance [J].
Emerson, RE ;
Koch, MO ;
Daggy, JK ;
Cheng, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 29 (02) :225-229
[10]   Do close but negative margins in radical prostatectomy specimens increase the risk of postoperative progression? [J].
Epstein, JI ;
Sauvageot, J .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (01) :241-243