Radiation Dose Reduction in Scoliosis Patients: Low-Dose Full-Spine Radiography with Digital Flat Panel Detector and Image Stitching System

被引:17
作者
Grieser, T. [2 ]
Baldauf, A. Q. [3 ]
Ludwig, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Klinikum Herford, Klin Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, D-32049 Herford, Germany
[2] Klinikum Augsburg, Klin Diagnost Radiol & Neuroradiol, Augsburg, Germany
[3] Theresienkrankenhaus Mannheim, Abt Radiol, Mannheim, Germany
来源
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN | 2011年 / 183卷 / 07期
关键词
spine; digital radiography; radiation safety; technology assessment; STORAGE-PHOSPHOR SYSTEMS; SCREEN-FILM RADIOGRAPHY; X-RAY-EXAMINATION; SCANNING METHOD; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; CHEST RADIOGRAPHY; EXPOSURE; CHILDREN; OPTIMIZATION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1055/s-0029-1246010
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the exposure dose reduction with a digital flat panel detector (FPD) and an image stitching system (ISS) in full-spine radiography for scoliosis patients. Materials and Methods: During a 6-month period, all consecutive scoliosis patients with a clinical indication for full-spine radiography (n = 50) were examined with an FPD and ISS. Automatic exposure control adjusted to speed class 1600 was used together with age-adjusted tube voltage and filtration. Dose area products were recorded for all images (antero-posterior n = 50, lateral n = 18). Images were evaluated by two radiologists for the possibility (possible, impossible) of typical scoliosis measurements (Cobb angle, Stagnara angle, lateral deviation, Risser stage). All measurements assessed as impossible underwent a second evaluation categorizing the reason why a measurement was impossible (underlying pathology, projection, image quality). Patient characteristics influencing exposure were recorded (sex, age, weight, height). Mean dose area products were compared to the literature with consideration of patient group and image quality. Results: The mean dose area product was 16.8 mu Gy m(2) for antero-posterior images and 26.6 mu Gy m(2) for lateral images. A comparison to published values showed an exposure dose reduction of 47% to 93%. Measurement of the Cobb and Stagnara angle, lateral deviation and Risser stage was possible in 96% (n = 50), 83% (n = 18), 100% (n = 50) and 100% (n = 50) of cases. The reasons for impossible measurements were independent of image quality (underlying pathologies, projection). Conclusion: When imaging scoliosis patients, an FPD combined with an ISS can substantially reduce the exposure dose.
引用
收藏
页码:645 / 649
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   The risk of carcinogenesis from radiographs to pediatric orthopaedic patients [J].
Bone, CM ;
Hsieh, GH .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2000, 20 (02) :251-254
[2]   Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography [J].
Busch, HP ;
Busch, S ;
Decker, C ;
Schilz, C .
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2003, 175 (01) :32-37
[3]  
Cobb J, 1948, Instr Course Lect, V5, P261
[4]  
Doody MM, 2000, SPINE, V25, P2052
[5]   Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: radiation dose optimization [J].
Geijer, H ;
Verdonck, B ;
Beckman, KW ;
Andersson, T ;
Persliden, J .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (03) :543-551
[6]   Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: Initial evaluation [J].
Geijer, H ;
Beckman, KW ;
Jonsson, B ;
Andersson, T ;
Persliden, J .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 218 (02) :402-410
[7]   Radiography of scoliosis: comparative dosimetry between conventional technique and digital fluorography [J].
Gorincour, G. ;
Barrau, K. ;
Waultier, S. ;
Viehweger, E. ;
Paris, M. ;
Jouve, J. L. ;
Bourrelly, M. ;
Aschero, A. ;
Bourliere, B. ;
Mundler, O. ;
Bollini, G. ;
Auquier, P. ;
Devred, P. ;
Petit, P. .
JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2007, 88 (03) :361-366
[8]   Digital radiography with a large-scale electronic flat-panel detector vs screen-film radiography: observer preference in clinical skeletal diagnostics [J].
Hamers, S ;
Freyschmidt, J ;
Neitzel, U .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (09) :1753-1759
[9]   Optimisation of scoliosis examinations in children [J].
Hansen, J ;
Jurik, AG ;
Fiirgaard, B ;
Egund, N .
PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2003, 33 (11) :752-765
[10]   LOW-DOSE RADIOGRAPHY OF SCOLIOSIS IN CHILDREN - A COMPARISON OF METHODS [J].
KALMAR, JA ;
JONES, JP ;
MERRITT, CRB .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (07) :818-823