Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads

被引:521
作者
Wells, GL [1 ]
Small, M
Penrod, S
Malpass, RS
Fulero, SM
Brimacombe, CAE
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Psychol, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] So Illinois Univ, Dept Psychol, Carbondale, IL 62901 USA
[3] Univ Nebraska, Dept Psychol, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
[4] Univ Texas, Dept Psychol, El Paso, TX 79968 USA
[5] Sinclair Coll, Dept Psychol, Dayton, OH 45402 USA
[6] Wright State Univ, Sch Med, Dayton, OH 45402 USA
[7] Univ Victoria, Dept Psychol, Victoria, BC V8W 3P5, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1023/A:1025750605807
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
There is increasing evidence that false eyewitness identification is the primary cause of the conviction of innocent people. In 1996, the American Psychology/Law Society and Division 41 of the American Psychological Association appointed a subcommittee to review scientific evidence and make recommendations regarding the best procedures for constructing and conducting lineups and photospreads. Three important themes from the scientific literature relevant to lineup methods were identified and reviewed, namely relative-judgment processes, the lineups-as-experiments analogy, and confidence malleability. Recommendations are made that double-blind lineup testing should be used, that eyewitnesses should be forewarned that the culprit might not be present, that distracters should be selected based on the eyewitness's verbal description of the perpetrator; and that confidence should be assessed and recorded at the time of identification. The potential costs and benefits of these recommendations are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 647
页数:45
相关论文
共 141 条
[1]  
*AM LAW I, 1975, MOD COD PREARR PROC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1983, Recent psychological research and new perspectives
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, ADULT EYEWITNESS TES
[4]  
[Anonymous], WITNESS DEFENSE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1957, NOT GUILTY
[6]  
[Anonymous], PRACTICAL ASPECTS ME
[7]  
[Anonymous], JURIMETRICS J
[8]  
Borchard E., 1932, CONVICTING INNOCENT
[9]   CORRELATION OF EYEWITNESS ACCURACY AND CONFIDENCE - OPTIMALITY HYPOTHESIS REVISITED [J].
BOTHWELL, RK ;
BRIGHAM, JC ;
DEFFENBACHER, KA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 72 (04) :691-695
[10]  
BOTHWELL RK, 1987, J SOC BEHAV PERS, V2, P335