A Cross-Cultural Study of Justice Sensitivity and Its Consequences for Cooperation

被引:18
作者
Baumert, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Maltese, Simona [3 ]
Reis, Dorota [4 ]
MacLeod, Colin [5 ]
Tan-Mansukhani, Roseann [6 ]
Galang, Adrianne John R. [6 ,7 ]
Salanga, Maria Guadalupe C. [6 ]
Schmitt, Manfred [8 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Res Collect Goods, Kurt Schumacher Str 10, D-53113 Bonn, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Sch Educ, Munich, Germany
[3] Cent Inst Mental Hlth, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Mannheim, Germany
[4] Saarland Univ, Saarbrucken, Germany
[5] Univ Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
[6] De La Salle Univ, Manila, Philippines
[7] Masaryk Univ, Brno, Czech Republic
[8] Univ Koblenz Landau, Landau, Germany
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Justice Sensitivity; Philippines; cross-cultural; measurement invariance; trust game; FIT INDEXES; SELF;
D O I
10.1177/1948550619896895
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In Western samples, individuals differ systematically in the importance they assign to matters of justice and injustice, and dispositional Justice Sensitivity can be differentiated according to the perspectives of victim, observer, beneficiary, and perpetrator. In a cross-cultural comparison between the Philippines, Germany, and Australia (N = 677 students), we investigated whether Justice Sensitivity can be equivalently described by these four perspectives, whether measurement instruments have invariant psychometric properties, and whether the psychological relevance of the Justice Sensitivity perspectives for cooperation behavior differs between these cultural contexts. The results of multigroup confirmatory factor analyses support weak measurement invariance and invariant associations between Justice Sensitivity perspectives and trust game decisions. Across cultures, victim sensitivity predicted reluctance to cooperate under threat of exploitation, and observer, beneficiary, and perpetrator sensitivities predicted cooperation under temptation. Our study extends insight into Justice Sensitivity to underresearched cultural contexts of urban and rural Philippines.
引用
收藏
页码:899 / 907
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Baumert A., 2016, Handbook of Social Justice Theory, Research
[2]   TRUST, RECIPROCITY, AND SOCIAL-HISTORY [J].
BERG, J ;
DICKHAUT, J ;
MCCABE, K .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 1995, 10 (01) :122-142
[3]  
Browne M.W., 1993, SOCIOL METHOD RES, P445
[4]  
Chalmers RP, 2012, J STAT SOFTW, V48, P1
[5]   Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance [J].
Chen, Fang Fang .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2007, 14 (03) :464-504
[6]   PERSONALITY-RESEARCH IN A NONWESTERN CULTURE - THE PHILIPPINES [J].
CHURCH, AT .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1987, 102 (02) :272-292
[7]   GPOWER: A general power analysis program [J].
Erdfelder, E ;
Faul, F ;
Buchner, A .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 1996, 28 (01) :1-11
[8]   Reward allocation and culture - A meta-analysis [J].
Fischer, R ;
Smith, PB .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 34 (03) :251-268
[9]   Differences Between Tight and Loose Cultures: A 33-Nation Study [J].
Gelfand, Michele J. ;
Raver, Jana L. ;
Nishii, Lisa ;
Leslie, Lisa M. ;
Lun, Janetta ;
Lim, Beng Chong ;
Duan, Lili ;
Almaliach, Assaf ;
Ang, Soon ;
Arnadottir, Jakobina ;
Aycan, Zeynep ;
Boehnke, Klaus ;
Boski, Pawel ;
Cabecinhas, Rosa ;
Chan, Darius ;
Chhokar, Jagdeep ;
D'Amato, Alessia ;
Ferrer, Montse ;
Fischlmayr, Iris C. ;
Fischer, Ronald ;
Fueloep, Marta ;
Georgas, James ;
Kashima, Emiko S. ;
Kashima, Yoshishima ;
Kim, Kibum ;
Lempereur, Alain ;
Marquez, Patricia ;
Othman, Rozhan ;
Overlaet, Bert ;
Panagiotopoulou, Penny ;
Peltzer, Karl ;
Perez-Florizno, Lorena R. ;
Ponomarenko, Larisa ;
Realo, Anu ;
Schei, Vidar ;
Schmitt, Manfred ;
Smith, Peter B. ;
Soomro, Nazar ;
Szabo, Erna ;
Taveesin, Nalinee ;
Toyama, Midori ;
Van de Vliert, Evert ;
Vohra, Naharika ;
Ward, Colleen ;
Yamaguchi, Susumu .
SCIENCE, 2011, 332 (6033) :1100-1104
[10]  
Gollwitzer M., 2005, SOC JUSTICE RES, V18, P183, DOI [10.1007/s11211-005-7368-1, DOI 10.1007/S11211-005-7368-1]