Influence of substrate roughness on particle adhesion and concentration

被引:0
作者
Sansao, Bernardo Moreno Baqueiro [1 ]
Cross, William M. [1 ]
Romkes, Albert [1 ]
Kellar, Jon J. [1 ]
机构
[1] South Dakota Sch Mines & Technol, Rapid City, SD 57701 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
SURFACE-ENERGY; CONTACT; FORCES;
D O I
10.1007/s42461-021-00521-9
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
In this research study, the interaction of particles with substrates of different roughness magnitude was investigated. Particle surface treatment, relative humidity (RH), and surface roughness levels were controlled in order to achieve separation of different particles by applying removal forces. Three different approaches to reproducibly roughen surfaces were used. Initially, glass disks were laser engraved to create a reproducible, controlled roughness substrate. However, the laser engraving method produced surface features that were much greater in scale than the particles. These scale differences were such that the substrates produced were not of value to this research. The second option investigated to induce reproducible substrate roughness was to scratch the glass disk using sandpapers of known grain size. A third approach to establish reproducible roughness was to use fine stainless-steel wire mesh substrates. In tests with sanded glass disks, the interfacial energy of plasma-cleaned (hydrophilic) glass beads had a high variation at 40% RH, showing non-uniformity of area of contact between particles and substrates. As the RH increased, it was expected that the interfacial energy of hydrophilic particles would increase, but this behavior was not observed. In addition, comparing the interfacial energy results of hydrophilic particles with hydrophobic particles, a region with significant interfacial energy difference was not identified. In the case of the stainless-steel mesh substrate, the mesh asperities and particle dimensions were comparable. Thus, the smaller particles had more area of contact with the substrate than the larger particles. For the plasma-cleaned (hydrophilic) beads, the recovery values had an average of 92.5% recovery when the RH was between 46 and 85%. For the hydrophobic beads, the average recovery was 19.0% when the RH was between 46 and 75%. Thus, the hydrophobic characteristic of the particle influenced its lower interaction with the mesh substrate. The difference in recovery can be exploited to achieve separation of particles based upon adhesive forces.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 12
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], HOME SURFACE MEASURE
[2]   Wetting of low-energy surfaces [J].
Churaev, N. V. ;
Sobolev, V. D. .
ADVANCES IN COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 2007, 134-35 (15-23) :15-23
[3]   ATTRACTIVE FORCES AT INTERFACES [J].
FOWKES, FM .
INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, 1964, 56 (12) :40-&
[4]   Modeling adhesive force distributions on highly rough surfaces [J].
Fritzsche, Joerg ;
Peuker, Urs Alexander .
POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 289 :88-94
[5]   A THEORY FOR ESTIMATION OF SURFACE AND INTERFACIAL ENERGIES .3. ESTIMATION OF SURFACE ENERGIES OF SOLIDS FROM CONTACT ANGLE DATA [J].
GOOD, RJ ;
GIRIFALCO, LA .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1960, 64 (05) :561-565
[6]   SURFACE ENERGY AND CONTACT OF ELASTIC SOLIDS [J].
JOHNSON, KL ;
KENDALL, K ;
ROBERTS, AD .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES A-MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES, 1971, 324 (1558) :301-&
[7]  
Kellar JJ, 2018, PROPOSAL NATL SCI FD
[8]   Adhesive Strength of Contacts of Rough Spheres [J].
Li, Qiang ;
Pohrt, Roman ;
Popov, Valentin L. .
FRONTIERS IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING-SWITZERLAND, 2019, 5
[9]  
Moudgil B. M., 2003, 22 INT MIN PROC C CA
[10]   ESTIMATION OF SURFACE FREE ENERGY OF POLYMERS [J].
OWENS, DK ;
WENDT, RC .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE, 1969, 13 (08) :1741-&