Development of preparatory activity indexed by the contingent negative variation in children

被引:35
作者
Flores, Angelica B. [1 ]
Digiacomo, Marcia R. [1 ]
Meneres, Susana [1 ]
Trigo, Eva [1 ]
Gomez, Carlos M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Seville, Fac Psicol, Dept Psicol Expt, Human Psychobiol Lab, Seville 41018, Spain
关键词
Contingent negative variation; Child development; Posner's paradigm; Anticipatory attention; Motor preparation; Sensory preparation; Slow brain potentials; ANTICIPATORY MECHANISMS; VISUOSPATIAL ATTENTION; STIMULUS ANTICIPATION; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; MOTOR PREPARATION; EYE-MOVEMENT; POTENTIALS; MATURATION; ARTIFACT; ACTIVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.bandc.2009.04.011
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Objectives: The present study investigated the effect of age on task-specific preparatory activation induced by a spatial cue using the central cue Posner's paradigm. The behavioral responses and the contingent negative variation (CNV) generated between S1 (the warning stimulus) and S2 (the imperative stimulus) were compared between 16 healthy children (8-13 years old) and 17 healthy young adults (18-23 years old). Methods: The EEG was recorded from 20 scalp sites of the International 10-20 system. The complete trial period included a central directional cue that was on for 300 m s and an attentive waiting period lasting 1360 m s. Finally, a peripheral target appeared, subtending a visual angle of 4.56 degrees and situated 2.28 degrees eccentrically in the horizontal meridian. The early and late components of the CNV appearing in the period between cue and target were analyzed. Results: The CNV of children showed no contralateral cortical activation related to motor preparation. However, the young adults showed contralateral activation to the cue over motor areas. Both children and young adults showed cortical activation in posterior sensory areas, displaying a pattern of activation contralateral to the cue. Also, a positive parietal component appeared in children during the CNV period. Conclusions: These results suggest that the motor preparation system in children is less mature than the sensory preparatory system. The children may have used strategies and brain areas different from those of the young adults to prepare for stimuli and responses. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 140
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Slow Cortical Potentials and Behavior
[2]   How do children prepare to react? Imaging maturation of motor preparation and stimulus anticipation by late contingent negative variation [J].
Bender, S ;
Weisbrod, M ;
Bornfleth, H ;
Resch, F ;
Oelkers-Ax, R .
NEUROIMAGE, 2005, 27 (04) :737-752
[3]   Lack of age-dependent development of the contingent negative variation (CNV) in migraine children? [J].
Bender, S ;
Weisbrod, M ;
Just, U ;
Pfüller, U ;
Parzer, P ;
Resch, F ;
Oelkers-Ax, R .
CEPHALALGIA, 2002, 22 (02) :132-136
[4]   The effects of spatial uncertainty and cue predictability on visual orienting in children [J].
Brodeur, DA ;
Boden, C .
COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 2000, 15 (03) :367-382
[5]  
BRUNIA CH, 2001, INT J PSYCHOPHYSIOL, V43, P213
[6]   Neural aspects of anticipatory behavior [J].
Brunia, CHM .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1999, 101 (2-3) :213-242
[7]   DISTRIBUTION OF SLOW BRAIN POTENTIALS RELATED TO MOTOR PREPARATION AND STIMULUS ANTICIPATION IN A TIME-ESTIMATION TASK [J].
BRUNIA, CHM ;
DAMEN, EJP .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1988, 69 (03) :234-243
[8]  
CHIARENZA GA, 1983, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V56, P373, DOI 10.1016/0013-4694(83)90263-8
[9]   A critical period of brain development: Studies of cerebral glucose utilization with PET [J].
Chugani, HT .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1998, 27 (02) :184-188
[10]  
COHEN J, 1970, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V28, P99