Early clinical experience with varian halcyon V2 linear accelerator: Dual-isocenter IMRT planning and delivery with portal dosimetry for gynecological cancer treatments

被引:30
作者
Kim, Hayeon [1 ]
Huq, M. Saiful [1 ]
Lalonde, Ron [1 ]
Houser, Christopher J. [1 ]
Beriwal, Sushil [1 ]
Heron, Dwight E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, UPMC Hillman Canc Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
dual-isocenter; extended-field IMRT; gynecological cancer; Halcyon; 2; 0; In vivo portal dosimetry; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; CERVICAL-CANCER; EXTENDED-FIELD; MEGAVOLTAGE PHOTON; DOSE CALCULATIONS; QUANTIFICATION; PROSTATE; THERAPY; QA;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.12747
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose Varian Halcyon linear accelerator version 2 (The Halcyon 2.0) was recently released with new upgraded features. The aim of this study was to report our clinical experience with Halcyon 2.0 for a dual-isocenter intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning and delivery for gynecological cancer patients and examine the feasibility of in vivo portal dosimetry. Methods Twelve gynecological cancer patients were treated with extended-field IMRT technique using two isocenters on Halcyon 2.0 to treat pelvis and pelvic/or para-aortic nodes region. The prescription dose was 45 Gy in 25 fractions (fxs) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) dose of 55 or 57.5 Gy in 25 fxs to involved nodes. All treatment plans, pretreatment patient-specific QA and treatment delivery records including daily in vivo portal dosimetry were retrospectively reviewed. For in vivo daily portal dosimetry analysis, each fraction was compared to the reference baseline (1st fraction) using gamma analysis criteria of 4 %/4 mm with 90% of total pixels in the portal image planar dose. Results All 12 extended-field IMRT plans met the planning criteria and delivered as planned (a total of 300 fractions). Conformity Index (CI) for the primary target was achieved with the range of 0.99-1.14. For organs at risks, most were well within the dose volume criteria. Treatment delivery time was from 5.0 to 6.5 min. Interfractional in vivo dose variation exceeded gamma analysis threshold for 8 fractions out of total 300 (2.7%). These eight fractions were found to have a relatively large difference in small bowel filling and SSD change at the isocenter compared to the baseline. Conclusion Halcyon 2.0 is effective to create complex extended-field IMRT plans using two isocenters with efficient delivery. Also Halcyon in vivo dosimetry is feasible for daily treatment monitoring for organ motion, internal or external anatomy, and body weight which could further lead to adaptive radiation therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 120
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], RDS TREATMENT PLANNI
[2]   Early clinical outcome with concurrent chemotherapy and extended-field, intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer [J].
Beriwal, Sushil ;
Gan, Gregory N. ;
Heron, Dwight E. ;
Selvaraj, Rai N. ;
Kim, Hayeon ;
Lalonde, Ron ;
Kelley, Joseph L. ;
Edwards, Robert P. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 68 (01) :166-171
[3]   A quantification of the effectiveness of EPID dosimetry and software-based plan verification systems in detecting incidents in radiotherapy [J].
Bojechko, Casey ;
Phillps, Mark ;
Kalet, Alan ;
Ford, Eric C. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (09) :5363-5369
[4]   Feasibility of portal dosimetry for flattening filter-free radiotherapy [J].
Chuter, Robert W. ;
Rixham, Philip A. ;
Weston, Steve J. ;
Cosgrove, Vivian P. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (01) :112-120
[5]   Critical Appraisal of the Treatment Planning Performance of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy by Means of a Dual Layer Stacked Multileaf Collimator for Head and Neck, Breast, and Prostate [J].
Cozzi, Luca ;
Fogliata, Antonella ;
Thompson, Stephen ;
Franzese, Ciro ;
Franceschini, Davide ;
de Rose, Fiorenza ;
Tomatis, Stefano ;
Scorsetti, Marta .
TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2018, 17 :1-11
[6]   Accelerator beam data commissioning equipment and procedures: Report of the TG-106 of the Therapy Physics Committee of the AAPM [J].
Das, Indra J. ;
Cheng, Chee-Wai ;
Watts, Ronald J. ;
Ahnesjo, Anders ;
Gibbons, John ;
Li, X. Allen ;
Lowenstein, Jessica ;
Mitra, Raj K. ;
Simon, William E. ;
Zhu, Timothy C. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (09) :4186-4215
[7]   Validation and IMRT/VMAT delivery quality of a preconfigured fast-rotating O-ring linac system [J].
De Roover, Robin ;
Crijns, Wouter ;
Poels, Kenneth ;
Michiels, Steven ;
Nulens, An ;
Vanstraelen, Bianca ;
Petillion, Saskia ;
De Brabandere, Marisol ;
Haustermans, Karin ;
Depuydt, Tom .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (01) :328-339
[8]   Automatic feathering of split fields for step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy [J].
Dogan, N ;
Leybovich, LB ;
Sethi, A ;
Emami, B .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 48 (09) :1133-1140
[9]   IMRT commissioning: Multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119 [J].
Ezzell, Gary A. ;
Burmeister, Jay W. ;
Dogan, Nesrin ;
LoSasso, Thomas J. ;
Mechalakos, James G. ;
Mihailidis, Dimitris ;
Molineu, Andrea ;
Palta, Jatinder R. ;
Ramsey, Chester R. ;
Salter, Bill J. ;
Shi, Jie ;
Xia, Ping ;
Yue, Ning J. ;
Xiao, Ying .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (11) :5359-5373
[10]   Quantification of intra-fraction changes during radiotherapy of cervical cancer assessed with pre- and post-fraction Cone Beam CT scans [J].
Heijkoop, Sabrina T. ;
Langerak, Thomas R. ;
Quint, Sandra ;
Mens, Jan Willem M. ;
Zolnay, Andras G. ;
Heijmen, Ben J. M. ;
Hoogeman, Mischa S. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 117 (03) :536-541