The Social Virtues: Two Accounts

被引:7
作者
Goldberg, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Philosophy, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
来源
ACTA ANALYTICA-INTERNATIONAL PERIODICAL FOR PHILOSOPHY IN THE ANALYTICAL TRADITION | 2009年 / 24卷 / 04期
关键词
Testimony; Social epistemology; Virtue epistemology; Epistemological individualism;
D O I
10.1007/s12136-009-0059-z
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Social (epistemic) virtues are the virtues bound up with those forms of inquiry involved in social routes to knowledge. A thoroughly individualistic account of the social virtues endorses two claims: (1) we can fully characterize the nature of the social virtues independent of the social factors that are typically in play when these virtues are exemplified, and (2) even when a subject's route to knowledge is social, the only epistemic virtues that are relevant to her acquisition of knowledge are those she herself possesses. A social (or anti-individualistic) account of the social virtues, by contrast, denies one or both of these claims. I will offer some reasons for thinking that the individualistic account is not acceptable, and that one or the other social account provides a better understanding of the social virtues. The argument is not decisive, but it does suggest that the social dimension of social epistemic virtues is not fully characterizable in individualistic terms.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 248
页数:12
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] Alston W.P., 1994, Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge. Ed, P29
  • [2] Goldberg S., RELYING OTH IN PRESS
  • [3] Goldberg SanfordC., 2007, ANTIINDIVIDUALISM MI
  • [4] Goldman A. I., 1979, JUSTIFICATION KNOWLE, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-9493-5
  • [5] Kornblith Hilary., 1994, SOCIALIZING EPISTEMO, P93
  • [6] Why we don't deserve credit for everything we know
    Lackey, Jennifer
    [J]. SYNTHESE, 2007, 158 (03) : 345 - 361
  • [7] MCDOWELL J, 1994, KNOWLEDGE HEARSAY
  • [8] Sosa Ernest, 2007, VIRTUE EPISTEMOLOGY