Violations and migrations in health care: a framework for understanding and management

被引:119
作者
Amalberti, R. [1 ]
Vincent, C.
Auroy, Y.
de Saint Maurice, G.
机构
[1] IMASSA, Dept Cognit Sci, F-91223 Bretigny Sur Orge, France
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London, England
[3] St Marys Hosp, London, England
[4] Percy Mil Hosp, Paris, France
来源
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE | 2006年 / 15卷
关键词
D O I
10.1136/qshc.2005.015982
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Violations are deliberate deviations from standard procedure. The usual reaction is to attempt to eliminate them and reprimand those concerned. However, the situation is not that simple. Firstly, violations paradoxically may be markers of high levels of safety because they need constraints and defences to exist. They may even become more frequent than errors in ultrasafe systems. Secondly, violations have both positive and negative aspects. On the one hand they occur frequently, increase system performance and individual satisfaction, are mostly limited to practices with limited safety consequences, and therefore are often tolerated or even encouraged by the hierarchy. On the other hand, extreme violations can lead to real danger or actual harm. This paper proposes a three phase model derived from Rasmussen's theory of migration to boundaries to explain the mechanism by which the deviance occurs, stabilizes, regresses, or progresses to harm. The model suggests that violations are unavoidable because system dynamics and deviances are markers of adaptation to this dynamicity. Violations cannot be eliminated but they can be managed. Solutions are specific to each step of the model, with a mix of relaxing constraints, increasing peer control ( staff), and constraining dangerous individuals.
引用
收藏
页码:I66 / I71
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR
    AJZEN, I
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) : 179 - 211
  • [2] The paradoxes of almost totally safe transportation systems
    Amalberti, R
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2001, 37 (2-3) : 109 - 126
  • [3] AMALBERTI R, 2006, HDB HUMAN FACTORS ER, P332
  • [4] [Anonymous], TRANSGRESSION REGLES
  • [5] Ashby W. R., 1956, INTRO CYBERNETICS
  • [6] Ayres I., 1992, RESPONSIVE REGULATIO
  • [7] The Canadian Adverse Events Study:: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada
    Baker, GR
    Norton, PG
    Flintoft, V
    Blais, R
    Brown, A
    Cox, J
    Etchells, E
    Ghali, WA
    Hébert, P
    Majumdar, SR
    O'Beirne, M
    Palacios-Derflingher, L
    Reid, RJ
    Sheps, S
    Tamblyn, R
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2004, 170 (11) : 1678 - 1686
  • [8] Anaesthetists' intentions to violate safety guidelines
    Beatty, PCW
    Beatty, SF
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2004, 59 (06) : 528 - 540
  • [9] INCIDENCE OF ADVERSE EVENTS AND NEGLIGENCE IN HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS - RESULTS OF THE HARVARD MEDICAL-PRACTICE STUDY-I
    BRENNAN, TA
    LEAPE, LL
    LAIRD, NM
    HEBERT, L
    LOCALIO, AR
    LAWTHERS, AG
    NEWHOUSE, JP
    WEILER, PC
    HIATT, HH
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 324 (06) : 370 - 376
  • [10] Clot Y, 1997, TRAV HUMAIN, V60, P113