Validation of real-time polymerase chain reaction versus conventional polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of brucellosis in cattle sera

被引:5
作者
Abdel-Hamid, Nour H. [1 ]
Beleta, Eman I. M. [1 ]
Kelany, Mohamed A. [2 ]
Ismail, Rania I. [1 ]
Shalaby, Nadia A. [1 ]
Khafagi, Manal H. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Agr Res Ctr, Anim Hlth Res Inst, Dept Brucellosis Res, Giza 12618, Egypt
[2] Agr Res Ctr, Dept Microbiol, Cent Lab Residue Anal Pesticides & Heavy Met Food, Giza, Egypt
[3] Natl Res Ctr, Dept Parasitol & Anim Dis, 33 Bohouth St, Giza 12622, Egypt
关键词
bacteriological results; Brucella; conventional polymerase chain reaction; diagnostic sensitivity; diagnostic specificity; TaqMan real-time-polymerase chain reaction; PCR DETECTION; ABORTUS; SPP; DNA; SPECIFICITY; SENSITIVITY; IS711;
D O I
10.14202/vetworld.2021.144-154
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Background and Aim: Different polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques have and are still being used for the direct detection of Brucella DNA in serum samples of different animal species and humans without being validated or properly validated, resulting in discrepancies. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the TaqMan Real-Time-PCR (RT-PCR) targeting the bcsp31 gene versus conventional PCR for the accurate diagnosis of brucellosis at the genus level in cattle sera. Materials and Methods: One hundred and eighty-four serum samples were collected from bacteriologically positive and negative cows with ages ranging from 1 to 5 years old at some infected private farms in the Nile Delta under quarantine measures as well as brucellosis free farms. These samples were classified into four groups after serological diagnosis and investigated by TaqMan RT-PCR and conventional PCR targeting the IS711 gene for Brucella DNA detection. The diagnostic performance characteristics of both PCR techniques were estimated considering the bacteriological results as a gold standard. Results: TaqMan RT-PCR revealed superiority over conventional PCR; it was able to detect Brucella DNA in 95% (67/70) and 89% (25/28) of the cattle sera samples belonging to Group 1 (serologically and bacteriologically positive) and Group 2 (serologically negative but bacteriologically positive), respectively. On evaluating the diagnostic performance, TaqMan RT-PCR showed superior diagnostic sensitivity (93.9%), diagnostic specificity (88.4%), performance index (182.3), almost perfect kappa agreement (0.825 +/- 0.042), strong positive correlation (r=0.826), high accuracy based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and area under the ROC curve (0.911) at p<0.05 and CI of 95%. Conclusion: A cattle serum sample is not the metric of choice for targeting Brucella genomic DNA by conventional PCR. The time-saving and rapid TaqMan RT-PCR method revealed a better diagnostic performance in the detection of Brucella DNA in cattle sera. Such performance offered by TaqMan RT-PCR may be considered a step toward the possibility of using such technology in the direct differentiation between Brucella-infected and -vaccinated cattle immunized by smooth vaccines from cattle sera using primers specific for such vaccines.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 154
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Genetic variation of Brucella isolates at strain level in Egypt [J].
Abdel-Hamid, Nour H. ;
El-bauomy, Essam M. ;
Ghobashy, Hazem M. ;
Shehata, Abeer A. .
VETERINARY MEDICINE AND SCIENCE, 2020, 6 (03) :421-432
[2]  
Ahlgren P, 2004, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V55, P843, DOI 10.1002/asi.20030
[3]   Serological and molecular evidence of Brucella species in the rapidly growing pig sector in Kenya [J].
Akoko, James ;
Pelle, Roger ;
Kivali, Velma ;
Schelling, Esther ;
Shirima, Gabriel ;
Machuka, Eunice ;
Mathew, Coletha ;
Fevre, Eric M. ;
Kyallo, Victoria ;
Falzon, Laura C. ;
Lukambagire, AbdulHamid S. ;
Halliday, Jo E. B. ;
Bonfoh, Bassirou ;
Kazwala, Rudovick ;
Ouma, Collins .
BMC VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2020, 16 (01)
[4]   Comparison of Different PCR Methods for Detection of Brucella spp. in Human Blood Samples [J].
Al-Ajlan, Hisham H. ;
Ibrahim, Abdelnasser S. S. ;
Al-Salamah, Ali A. .
POLISH JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 60 (01) :27-33
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2021, MANUAL DIAGNOSTIC TE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2011, MOL MICROBIOLOGY GEN
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1988, TECHNIQUES BRUCELLOS
[8]  
Awwad E., 2016, Scientific Bulletin. Series F. Biotechnologies, V20, P321
[9]   Real-time PCR for identification of Brucella spp.: A comparative study of IS711, bcsp31 and per target genes [J].
Bounaadja, Lotfi ;
Albert, David ;
Chenais, Benoit ;
Henault, Sylvie ;
Zygmunt, Michel S. ;
Poliak, Sylvie ;
Garin-Bastuji, Bruno .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2009, 137 (1-2) :156-164
[10]   DIFFERENTIATION OF BRUCELLA-ABORTUS-BV-1, BRUCELLA-ABORTUS-BV-2, AND BRUCELLA-ABORTUS-BV-4, BRUCELLA-MELITENSIS, BRUCELLA-OVIS, AND BRUCELLA-SUIS-BV-1 BY PCR [J].
BRICKER, BJ ;
HALLING, SM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 32 (11) :2660-2666