Tetrahydrocannabinol Does Not Reduce Pain in Patients With Chronic Abdominal Pain in a Phase 2 Placebo-controlled Study

被引:59
作者
de Vries, Marjan [1 ]
van Rijckevorsel, Dagmar C. M. [1 ]
Vissers, Kris C. P. [2 ]
Wilder-Smith, Oliver H. G. [2 ,3 ]
van Goor, Harry [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Anesthesiol Pain & Palliat Med, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Aalborg Univ, Dept Hlth Sci, Ctr Sensory Motor Interact, Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
Marijuana; Chronic Pain; AE; Randomized Controlled Trial; CHRONIC-PANCREATITIS; CATASTROPHIZING SCALE; MECHANISMS; TRIALS; PHARMACOKINETICS; METAANALYSIS; VALIDATION; PERCEPTION; RESPONSES; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cgh.2016.09.147
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the most abundant cannabinoid from the plant Cannabis sativa. There is only equivocal evidence that THC has analgesic effects. We performed a phase 2 controlled trial to evaluate the analgesic efficacy, pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of an oral tablet containing purified THC in patients with chronic abdominal pain. METHODS: Sixty-five patients with chronic abdominal pain for 3 months or more (numeric rating scale scores of 3 or more) after surgery or because of chronic pancreatitis were randomly assigned to groups given the THC tablet or identical matching placebos for 50-52 days. Subjects in the THC group were given the tablet first in a step-up phase (3 mg 3 times daily for 5 days and then 5 mg 3 times daily for 5 days), followed by a stable dose phase (8 mg 3 times daily until days 50-52). Preceding and during the entire study period, patients were asked to continue taking their medications (including analgesics) according to prescription. Patients reported any additional pain medications in a diary. Efficacy and safety assessments were conducted preceding medication intake (day 1), after 15 days, and at 50-52 days. Plasma samples were collected on study days 1, 15, and 50-52; mean plasma concentration curves of THC and 11-OH-THC were plotted. The primary end point was pain relief, which was measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS) of the mean pain (VAS mean scores) on the basis of information from patient diaries. Secondary end points included pain and quality of life (determined from patient questionnaires), pharmacokinetics, and safety. RESULTS: At days 50-52, VAS mean scores did not differ significantly between the THC and placebo groups (F-1,F-46= 0.016; P =.901). Between the start and end of the study, VAS mean scores decreased by 1.6 points (40%) in the THC group compared with 1.9 points (37%) in the placebo group. No differences were observed in secondary outcomes. Oral THC was generally well-absorbed. Seven patients in the THC group stopped taking the tablets because of adverse events, compared with 2 patients in the placebo group. All (possibly) related adverse events were mild or moderate. CONCLUSIONS: In a phase 2 study, we found no difference between a THC tablet and a placebo tablet in reducing pain measures in patients with chronic abdominal pain. THC, administered 3 times daily, was safe and well-tolerated during a 50-day to 52-day treatment period.
引用
收藏
页码:1079 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Cannabinoids in medicine: A review of their therapeutic potential [J].
Amar, MB .
JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 105 (1-2) :1-25
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Pain Suppl, V3, pS1
[3]   Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease [J].
Apkarian, AV ;
Bushnell, MC ;
Treede, RD ;
Zubieta, JK .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2005, 9 (04) :463-484
[4]   Hierarchical construct validity of the treatment satisfaction questionnaire for medication (TSQM version II) among outpatient pharmacy consumers [J].
Atkinson, MJ ;
Kumar, R ;
Cappelleri, JC ;
Hass, SL .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2005, 8 :S9-S24
[5]  
Atsawarungruangkit Amporn, 2015, World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol, V6, P193, DOI 10.4291/wjgp.v6.i4.193
[6]  
Attard JAP, 2007, CAN J SURG, V50, P291
[7]  
Benedetti F, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P4315
[8]   Avoiding Nocebo Effects to Optimize Treatment Outcome [J].
Bingel, Ulrike .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 312 (07) :693-694
[9]   The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - An updated literature review [J].
Bjelland, I ;
Dahl, AA ;
Haug, TT ;
Neckelmann, D .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2002, 52 (02) :69-77
[10]   USE OF ANALOG SCALES IN RATING SUBJECTIVE FEELINGS [J].
BOND, A ;
LADER, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 47 (SEP) :211-218