A Bayesian false discovery rate for multiple testing

被引:20
作者
Whittemore, Alice S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Res & Policy, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Bayes; breast cancer; false discovery rate; false positive report probability; haplotypes; multiple comparisons; single nucleotide polymorphism;
D O I
10.1080/02664760600994745
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Case-control studies of genetic polymorphisms and gene-environment interactions are reporting large numbers of statistically significant associations, many of which are likely to be spurious. This problem reflects the low prior probability that any one null hypothesis is false, and the large number of test results reported for a given study. In a Bayesian approach to the low prior probabilities, Wacholder et al. ( 2004) suggest supplementing the p-value for a hypothesis with its posterior probability given the study data. In a frequentist approach to the test multiplicity problem, Benjamini & Hochberg ( 1995) propose a hypothesis-rejection rule that provides greater statistical power by controlling the false discovery rate rather than the family-wise error rate controlled by the Bonferroni correction. This paper defines a Bayes false discovery rate and proposes a Bayes-based rejection rule for controlling it. The method, which combines the Bayesian approach of Wacholder et al. with the frequentist approach of Benjamini & Hochberg, is used to evaluate the associations reported in a case-control study of breast cancer risk and genetic polymorphisms of genes involved in the repair of double-strand DNA breaks.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
Benjamini Y, 2001, ANN STAT, V29, P1165
[2]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[3]   Variants in DNA double-strand break repair genes and breast cancer susceptibility [J].
Kuschel, B ;
Auranen, A ;
McBride, S ;
Novik, KL ;
Antoniou, A ;
Lipscombe, JM ;
Day, NE ;
Easton, DF ;
Ponder, BAJ ;
Pharoah, PDP ;
Dunning, A .
HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS, 2002, 11 (12) :1399-1407
[4]   Gene-environment interactions: How many false positives? [J].
Matullo, G ;
Berwick, M ;
Vineis, P .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2005, 97 (08) :550-551
[5]  
MCCULAGH P, 1991, GEN LINEAR MODELS
[6]   Statistical significance for genomewide studies [J].
Storey, JD ;
Tibshirani, R .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (16) :9440-9445
[7]   Betting odds and genetic associations [J].
Thomas, DC ;
Clayton, DG .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (06) :421-423
[8]   Assessing the probability that a positive report is false: An approach for molecular epidemiology studies [J].
Wacholder, S ;
Chanock, S ;
Garcia-Closas, M ;
El ghormli, L ;
Rothman, N .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (06) :434-442