An Electronic Competency-Based Evaluation Tool for Assessing Humanitarian Competencies in a Simulated Exercise

被引:6
作者
Evans, Andrea B. [1 ,2 ]
Hulme, Jennifer M. [3 ,4 ]
Nugus, Peter [5 ,6 ]
Cranmer, Hilarie H. [7 ]
Coutu, Melanie [8 ,9 ]
Johnson, Kirsten [6 ,8 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Sick Children, Emergency Dept, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Hosp Sick Children, Ctr Global Child Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Emergency Dept, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Family & Community Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Ctr Med Educ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] McGill Univ, Dept Family Med, 5858 Cote Neiges,3rd Floor,Suite 300, Montreal, PQ H3S 1Z1, Canada
[7] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Global Hlth, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[8] McGill Univ, McGill Humanitarian Studies Initiat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[9] Humanitarian U Inc, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[10] McGill Univ, Hlth Ctr, Emergency Dept, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
competency; evaluation; humanitarian response; humanitarian training; humanitarian workers; simulation exercise; MEDICAL-EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1017/S1049023X1700005X
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Methods The evaluation tool was first derived from the formerly Consortium of British Humanitarian Agencies' (CBHA; United Kingdom), now Start Network's, Core Humanitarian Competency Framework and formatted in an electronic data capture tool that allowed for offline evaluation. During a 3-day humanitarian simulation event, participants in teams of eight to 10 were evaluated individually at multiple injects by trained evaluators. Participants were assessed on five competencies and a global rating scale. Participants evaluated both themselves and their team members using the same tool at the end of the simulation exercise (SimEx). Results All participants (63) were evaluated. A total of 1,008 individual evaluations were completed. There were 90 (9.0%) missing evaluations. All 63 participants also evaluated themselves and each of their teammates using the same tool. Self-evaluation scores were significantly lower than peer-evaluations, which were significantly lower than evaluators' assessments. Participants with a medical degree, and those with humanitarian work experience of one month or more, scored significantly higher on all competencies assessed by evaluators compared to other participants. Participants with prior humanitarian experience scored higher on competencies regarding operating safely and working effectively as a team member. Conclusion This study presents a novel electronic evaluation tool to assess individual performance in five of six globally recognized humanitarian competency domains in a 3-day humanitarian SimEx. The evaluation tool provides a standardized approach to the assessment of humanitarian competencies that cannot be evaluated through knowledge-based testing in a classroom setting. When combined with testing knowledge-based competencies, this presents an approach to a comprehensive competency-based assessment that provides an objective measurement of competency with respect to the competencies listed in the Framework. There is an opportunity to advance the use of this tool in future humanitarian training exercises and potentially in real time, in the field. This could impact the efficiency and effectiveness of humanitarian operations.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 260
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Active Learning Network for Accountability and Performance in Humanitarian Action, STAT HUM SYST 2015 R
  • [2] [Anonymous], CAN DIS HUM RESP TRA
  • [3] Professionalization of Disaster Medicine-An Appraisal of Criterion-Referenced Qualifications
    Bradt, David
    Drummond, Christina
    [J]. PREHOSPITAL AND DISASTER MEDICINE, 2007, 22 (05) : 360 - 368
  • [4] Consortium of British Humanitarian Agencies, CONT HUM STAFF DEV P
  • [5] Consortium of British Humanitarian Agencies, EV CONS BRIT HUM AG
  • [6] Consortium of British Humanitarian Agencies, HUM CAP BUILD PROGR
  • [7] Cosgrave J, REAL TIME EVALUATION
  • [8] Cranmer H, 2014, PREHOSP DISASTER MED, V29
  • [9] Department of International Development-United Kingdom, HUM EM RESP REV
  • [10] Proficiency-based training for robotic surgery: construct validity, workload, and expert levels for nine inanimate exercises
    Dulan, Genevieve
    Rege, Robert V.
    Hogg, Deborah C.
    Gilberg-Fisher, Kristine M.
    Arain, Nabeel A.
    Tesfay, Seifu T.
    Scott, Daniel J.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (06): : 1516 - 1521