Differentiation of Breast Lesions and Distinguishing Their Histological Subtypes Using Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and ADC Values

被引:14
作者
Maric, Jelena [1 ]
Boban, Jasmina [2 ,3 ]
Ivkovic-Kapicl, Tatjana [2 ,3 ]
Djilas, Dragana [2 ,3 ]
Vucaj-Cirilovic, Viktorija [2 ,3 ]
Bogdanovic-Stojanovic, Dragana [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Gen Hosp Sveti Vracevi, Bijeljina, Bosnia & Herceg
[2] Univ Novi Sad, Fac Med Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
[3] Oncol Inst Vojvodina, Ctr Diagnost Imaging, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
[4] Oncol Inst Vojvodina, Dept Pathol, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
关键词
breast cancer; magnetic resonance imaging; Diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging; ADC values; differentiation; INVASIVE DUCTAL CARCINOMA; COEFFICIENT VALUES; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; CANCER; ESTROGEN; MRI; RECEPTORS; BENIGN; TUMORS;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2020.00332
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has not been well explored in differentiation of malignant from benign breast lesions. The aims of this study were to examine the role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in differentiation of malignant from benign tumors and distinguishing histological subtypes of malignant lesions, and to determine correlations between ADC values and breast tumors structure. This cohort-study included 174 female patients who underwent contrast-enhanced breast MR examination on a 3T scanner and were divided into two groups: patient group (114 patients with proven tumors) and control group (60 healthy patients). One-hundred-thirty-nine lesions (67 malignant and 72 benign) were detected and pathohistologically analyzed. Differences between variables were tested using chi-square test; correlations were determined using Pearson's correlation test. For determination of cut off values for diagnostic potential, Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were constructed. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Mean ADC values were significantly lower in malignant compared to benign lesions (0.68 x 10(-3)mm(2)/s vs. 1.12 x 10(-3)mm(2)/s, p < 0.001). The cut off value of ADC for benign lesions was 0.792 x 10(-3)mm(2)/s (sensitivity 98.6%, specificity 65.7%), and for malignant 0.993 x 10(-3)mm(2)/s (98.5, 80.6%). There were no significant correlations between malignant lesion subtypes and ADC values. DWI is a clinically useful tool for differentiation of malignant from benign lesions based on mean ADC values. The cut off value for benign lesions was higher than reported recently, due to high amount of fibrosis in included benign lesions. Finally, ADC values might have implications in determination of the biological nature of the malignant lesions.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]   Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast Protocol Optimization, Interpretation, and Clinical Applications [J].
Partridge, Savannah C. ;
McDonald, Elizabeth S. .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 21 (03) :601-+
[22]   Can Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Related Apparent Diffusion Coefficient be a Prognostic Value in Women With Breast Cancer? [J].
Rabasco, Paola ;
Caivano, Rocchina ;
Simeon, Vittorio ;
Dinardo, Giuseppina ;
Lotumolo, Antonella ;
Gioioso, Matilde ;
Villonio, Antonio ;
Iannelli, Giancarlo ;
D'Antuono, Felice ;
Zandolino, Alexis ;
Macarini, Luca ;
Guglielmi, Giuseppe ;
Cammarota, Aldo .
CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2017, 35 (02) :92-99
[23]   Multiparametric MR Imaging of Breast Cancer [J].
Rahbar, Habib ;
Partridge, Savannah C. .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2016, 24 (01) :223-+
[24]   Invasive ductal carcinoma: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient value with pathological prognostic factors [J].
Razek, Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel ;
Gaballa, Gada ;
Denewer, Adel ;
Nada, Nadia .
NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2010, 23 (06) :619-623
[25]  
Reimer P, 1999, MAGNETIC RESONANACE, P397
[26]   A Brief Overview of the WHO Classification of Breast Tumors, 4th Edition, Focusing on Issues and Updates from the 3rd Edition [J].
Sinn, Hans-Peter ;
Kreipe, Hans .
BREAST CARE, 2013, 8 (02) :149-154
[27]  
Tarniverdi O, 2014, ASIAN PAC J CANCER P, V15, P807, DOI [10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.2.807, DOI 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.2.807]
[28]   Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Breast Cancer: Correlation of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value with Pathologic Prognostic Factors [J].
Tezcan, Sehnaz ;
Uslu, Nihal ;
Ozturk, Funda Ulu ;
Akcay, Eda Yilmaz ;
Tezcaner, Tugan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH, 2019, 15 (04) :262-267
[29]   Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Estrogen Receptor-Positive and Lymph Node-Negative Invasive Breast Cancers at 3.0T DW-MRI: A Potential Predictor for an Oncotype Dx Test Recurrence Score [J].
Thakur, Sunitha B. ;
Durando, Manuela ;
Milans, Soledad ;
Cho, Gene Y. ;
Gennaro, Lucas ;
Sutton, Elizabeth J. ;
Giri, Dilip ;
Morris, Elizabeth A. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2018, 47 (02) :401-409
[30]   Diffusion-weighted Imaging of the Breast: Principles and Clinical Applications [J].
Woodhams, Reiko ;
Ramadan, Saadallah ;
Stanwell, Peter ;
Sakamoto, Satoko ;
Hata, Hirofumi ;
Ozaki, Masanori ;
Kan, Shinichi ;
Inoue, Yusuke .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2011, 31 (04) :1059-1084