Modeling nonlinear site effects in physics-based ground motion simulations of the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence

被引:18
作者
de la Torre, Christopher A. [1 ]
Bradley, Brendon A. [1 ]
Lee, Robin L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canterbury, Dept Civil & Nat Resources Engn, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
关键词
Site effects; soil nonlinearity; site response analysis; ground motion simulation; DOMAIN REDUCTION METHOD; W; 6.2; CHRISTCHURCH; NEW-ZEALAND; LOCALIZED REGIONS; PART II; FAULT; VERIFICATION; VARIABILITY; VALIDATION; PROFILES;
D O I
10.1177/8755293019891729
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study examines the performance of nonlinear total stress one-dimensional (1D) wave propagation site response analysis for modeling site effects in physics-based ground motion simulations of the 2010-2011 Canterbury, New Zealand earthquake sequence. This approach explicitly models three-dimensional (3D) ground motion phenomena at the regional scale, and detailed site effects at the local scale. The approach is compared with a more commonly used empirical V-S(30)-based method of computing site amplification for simulated ground motions, as well as prediction via an empirical ground motion model. Site-specific ground response analysis is performed at 20 strong motion stations in Christchurch for 11 earthquakes with 4.7 <= M-W <= 7.1. When compared with the V-S(30)-based approach, the wave propagation analysis reduces both overall model bias and uncertainty in site-to-site residuals at the fundamental period, and significantly reduces systematic residuals for soft or "atypical" sites that exhibit strong site amplification. The comparable performance in ground motion prediction between the physics-based simulation method and empirical ground motion models suggests the former is a viable approach for generating site-specific ground motions for geotechnical and structural response history analyses.
引用
收藏
页码:856 / 879
页数:24
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Afshari K, 2017, TECHNICAL REPORT
[2]   The Variability of Ground-Motion Prediction Models and Its Components [J].
Al Atik, Linda ;
Abrahamson, Norman ;
Bommer, Julian J. ;
Scherbaum, Frank ;
Cotton, Fabrice ;
Kuehn, Nicolas .
SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2010, 81 (05) :794-801
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, 200804 PEER
[4]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[5]   Fault slip models of the 2010-2011 Canterbury, New Zealand, earthquakes from geodetic data and observations of postseismic ground deformation [J].
Beavan, John ;
Motagh, Mahdi ;
Fielding, Eric J. ;
Donnelly, Nic ;
Collett, Dave .
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS, 2012, 55 (03) :207-221
[6]   Fault Location and Slip Distribution of the 22 February 2011 MW 6.2 Christchurch, New Zealand, Earthquake from Geodetic Data [J].
Beavan, John ;
Fielding, Eric ;
Motagh, Mahdi ;
Samsonov, Sergey ;
Donnelly, Nic .
SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2011, 82 (06) :789-799
[7]   Domain reduction method for three-dimensional earthquake modeling in localized regions, part I: theory [J].
Bielak, J ;
Loukakis, K ;
Hisada, Y ;
Yoshimura, C .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2003, 93 (02) :817-824
[8]   On the Relationship between Fourier and Response Spectra: Implications for the Adjustment of Empirical Ground-Motion Prediction Equations (GMPEs) [J].
Bora, Sanjay Singh ;
Scherbaum, Frank ;
Kuehn, Nicolas ;
Stafford, Peter .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2016, 106 (03) :1235-1253
[9]  
Bradley BA, 2015, P 10 PAC C EARTHHQ E
[10]   Ground-Motion Observations from the 14 November 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikoura, New Zealand, Earthquake and Insights from Broadband Simulations [J].
Bradley, Brendon A. ;
Razafindrakoto, Hoby N. T. ;
Polak, Viktor .
SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 88 (03) :740-756