Early and late outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair to treat abdominal aortic aneurysm compared between severe and non-severe infrarenal neck angulation

被引:10
|
作者
Chinsakchai, Khamin [1 ]
Suksusilp, Pichawat [1 ]
Wongwanit, Chumpol [1 ]
Hongku, Kiattisak [1 ]
Hahtapornsawan, Suteekhanit [1 ]
Puangpunngam, Nattawut [1 ]
Moll, Frans L. [2 ]
Sermsathanasawadi, Nuttawut [1 ]
Ruangsetakit, Chanean [1 ]
Mutirangura, Pramook [1 ]
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Fac Med, Div Vasc Surg, Dept Surg,Siriraj Hosp, 2 Wanglang Rd, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Vasc Surg, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Abdominal aortic aneurysm; endovascular aneurysm repair; severe proximal neck angulation; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; IA ENDOLEAK; STENT; EVAR;
D O I
10.1177/1708538120924552
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background Abdominal aortic aneurysm with severe infrarenal neck angle (>60 degrees) has long been thought to be an obstacle to endovascular aneurysm repair. However, some previous studies reported endovascular aneurysm repair to be safe and efficacious for treating abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients with severe neck angulation. The aim of this study was to investigate the early and late outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair to treat abdominal aortic aneurysm compared between patients with severe and non-severe infrarenal neck angulation. Methods Fifty-four severe and 144 non-severe neck angulation patients who were treated at Siriraj Hospital (Bangkok, Thailand) during January 2010-October 2013 were recruited. The primary endpoints were intraoperative neck complications (e.g., type 1A endoleak or proximal graft migration) and immediate adjunct aortic neck procedures. The secondary endpoints included perioperative mortality, overall survival, and the proportion of patients that were reintervention-free at five years compared between the severe and non-severe groups. Results Severe angulation patients were significantly older than non-severe angulation patients (77 +/- 6.3 vs. 74 +/- 7.9 years; p = 0.021). The median proximal angle was significantly greater in the severe group (82 degrees vs. 13.5 degrees; p < 0.001). Intraoperative proximal neck complications developed in 29.6% of patients in the severe angulation group compared with 9.0% in the non-severe group (p < 0.001). Significantly more patients in the severe group required intraoperative adjunct procedures (29.6% vs. 7.6%; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in perioperative mortality between groups. At the five-year follow-up, there was no significant difference between groups for overall survival or the proportion of patients that remained reintervention-free. Conclusions Endovascular aneurysm repair to treat abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients with severe proximal neck angulation is technically feasible and safe Although the severe angulation group had a higher rate of intraoperative neck complications and immediate adjunct neck procedures than the non-severe group, there was no significant difference between groups for 30-day mortality, overall survival or the proportion of patients who remained reintervention-free at five years.
引用
收藏
页码:683 / 691
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of vertebral compression fractures on aortic neck angulation after endovascular aneurysm repair
    Shearkhani, Omid
    Rohringer, Taryn J.
    Eisenberg, Naomi
    Mafeld, Sebastian
    Tan, Kong T.
    Jaberi, Arash
    Roche-Nagle, Graham
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 75 (05) : 1598 - 1604
  • [32] Influence of severe infrarenal aortic neck angulation on complications at the proximal neck following endovascular AAA repair: A EUROSTAR study
    Hobo, Roel
    Kievit, Jur
    Leurs, Lina J.
    Buth, Jacob
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2007, 14 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [33] Suitability of the Aortic Neck Anatomy for Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in Korean Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
    Hwang, Deokbi
    Kim, Jihye
    Kim, Hyung-Kee
    Huh, Seung
    VASCULAR SPECIALIST INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 36 (02) : 71 - 81
  • [34] Midterm outcomes of side branch embolization and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
    Shirasu, Takuro
    Akai, Atsushi
    Motoki, Manabu
    Kato, Masaaki
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 79 (04)
  • [35] Endograft apposition and infrarenal neck enlargement after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
    Van der Riet, Claire
    De Rooy, Philippe M.
    Tielliu, Ignace F.
    Kropman, Rogier H.
    Wille, Jan
    Narlawar, Ranjeet
    Elzefzaf, Nada Y.
    Antoniou, George A.
    De Vries, Jean-Paul
    Schuurmann, Richte C.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 62 (06) : 600 - 608
  • [36] Systematic review and meta-analysis of sex differences in outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm
    Liu, Yang
    Yang, Yi
    Zhao, Jichun
    Chen, Xiyang
    Wang, Jiarong
    Ma, Yukui
    Huang, Bin
    Yuan, Ding
    Du, Xiaojiong
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 71 (01) : 283 - +
  • [37] Outcomes after Open Surgery and Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Patients with Massive Neck Atheroma
    Hoshina, K.
    Hosaka, A.
    Takayama, T.
    Kato, M.
    Ohkubo, N.
    Okamoto, H.
    Shigematsu, K.
    Miyata, T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 43 (03) : 257 - 261
  • [38] Spinal Cord Ischemia Following Endovascular Repair of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
    Nakai, Shingo
    Uchida, Tetsuro
    Kuroda, Yoshinori
    Yamashita, Atsushi
    Oba, Eiichi
    Kobayashi, Kimihiro
    Ochiai, Tomonori
    Sadahiro, Mitsuaki
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR DISEASES, 2020, 13 (03) : 335 - 338
  • [39] Late rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair
    Rajendran, Saissan
    May, James
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 65 (01) : 52 - 57
  • [40] Racial disparities in presentation and outcomes for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
    Ribieras, Antoine J.
    Kang, Naixin
    Shao, Tony
    Kenel-Pierre, Stefan
    Rey, Jorge
    Velazquez, Omaida C.
    Bornak, Arash
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 77 (01) : 69 - 77