Early and late outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair to treat abdominal aortic aneurysm compared between severe and non-severe infrarenal neck angulation

被引:10
|
作者
Chinsakchai, Khamin [1 ]
Suksusilp, Pichawat [1 ]
Wongwanit, Chumpol [1 ]
Hongku, Kiattisak [1 ]
Hahtapornsawan, Suteekhanit [1 ]
Puangpunngam, Nattawut [1 ]
Moll, Frans L. [2 ]
Sermsathanasawadi, Nuttawut [1 ]
Ruangsetakit, Chanean [1 ]
Mutirangura, Pramook [1 ]
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Fac Med, Div Vasc Surg, Dept Surg,Siriraj Hosp, 2 Wanglang Rd, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Vasc Surg, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Abdominal aortic aneurysm; endovascular aneurysm repair; severe proximal neck angulation; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; IA ENDOLEAK; STENT; EVAR;
D O I
10.1177/1708538120924552
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background Abdominal aortic aneurysm with severe infrarenal neck angle (>60 degrees) has long been thought to be an obstacle to endovascular aneurysm repair. However, some previous studies reported endovascular aneurysm repair to be safe and efficacious for treating abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients with severe neck angulation. The aim of this study was to investigate the early and late outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair to treat abdominal aortic aneurysm compared between patients with severe and non-severe infrarenal neck angulation. Methods Fifty-four severe and 144 non-severe neck angulation patients who were treated at Siriraj Hospital (Bangkok, Thailand) during January 2010-October 2013 were recruited. The primary endpoints were intraoperative neck complications (e.g., type 1A endoleak or proximal graft migration) and immediate adjunct aortic neck procedures. The secondary endpoints included perioperative mortality, overall survival, and the proportion of patients that were reintervention-free at five years compared between the severe and non-severe groups. Results Severe angulation patients were significantly older than non-severe angulation patients (77 +/- 6.3 vs. 74 +/- 7.9 years; p = 0.021). The median proximal angle was significantly greater in the severe group (82 degrees vs. 13.5 degrees; p < 0.001). Intraoperative proximal neck complications developed in 29.6% of patients in the severe angulation group compared with 9.0% in the non-severe group (p < 0.001). Significantly more patients in the severe group required intraoperative adjunct procedures (29.6% vs. 7.6%; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in perioperative mortality between groups. At the five-year follow-up, there was no significant difference between groups for overall survival or the proportion of patients that remained reintervention-free. Conclusions Endovascular aneurysm repair to treat abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients with severe proximal neck angulation is technically feasible and safe Although the severe angulation group had a higher rate of intraoperative neck complications and immediate adjunct neck procedures than the non-severe group, there was no significant difference between groups for 30-day mortality, overall survival or the proportion of patients who remained reintervention-free at five years.
引用
收藏
页码:683 / 691
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Early and Late Clinical Outcomes of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in Patients with an Angulated Neck
    AbuRalima, Ali F.
    Campbell, John
    Stone, Patrick A.
    Nanjundappa, Aravinda
    Dean, L. Scott
    Keiffer, Tammi
    Emmett, Mary
    VASCULAR, 2010, 18 (02) : 93 - 101
  • [22] Influence of severe neck angulation on hemodynamic and clinical outcomes following endovascular aneurysm repair: a hemodynamic analysis and a retrospective cohort study
    Liu Yang
    Qing Ming
    Zhao Jichun
    Huang Bin
    Yang Yi
    Zheng Tinghui
    Yuan Ding
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2022, 135 (21)
  • [23] Strategy to avoid open surgical conversion after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair for patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm
    Chung, Byeoung-Hoon
    Heo, Seon-Hee
    Park, Yang-Jin
    Kim, Dong-Ik
    Kim, Duk-Kyoung
    Kim, Young-Wook
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2020, 99 (06) : 344 - 351
  • [24] Kilt Technique as an Angle Modification Method for Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with Severe Neck Angle
    Kim, Tae-Hoon
    Jang, Ho-Jun
    Choi, Young Jin
    Lee, Chang Keun
    Kwon, Sung Woo
    Shim, Won-Heum
    ANNALS OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 23 (02) : 96 - 103
  • [25] Endovascular Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms With Severe Neck Angulation
    Jim, Jeffrey
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2012, 19 (04) : 525 - 527
  • [26] Changes in the region of the proximal aneurysm neck after endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysm.
    Mahnken, AH
    Chalabi, K
    Schürmann, K
    Schmitz-Rode, T
    Günther, RW
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2000, 172 (10): : 842 - 846
  • [27] Outcomes of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Patients with Hostile Neck Anatomy
    Edward Choke
    Graham Munneke
    Robert Morgan
    Anna-Maria Belli
    Ian Loftus
    Robert McFarland
    Thomas Loosemore
    Matthew M. Thompson
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2006, 29 : 975 - 980
  • [28] Correlation Between Calcium Scoring and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Endovascular Repair Outcomes
    Farres, Houssam
    Lanka, Santh Prakash
    Nussbaum, Sam
    Shoukry, Mira
    Hanouneh, Tareq
    Alexander, Lauren
    Sella, David
    Jarmi, Tambi
    VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 58 (07) : 723 - 732
  • [29] Outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with hostile neck anatomy
    Choke, Edward
    Munneke, Graham
    Morgan, Robert
    Belli, Anna-Maria
    Loftus, Ian
    McFarland, Robert
    Loosemore, Thomas
    Thompson, Matthew M.
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2006, 29 (06) : 975 - 980
  • [30] Contemporary management of the demanding infrarenal neck in abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
    Mees, B. M. E.
    Peppelenbosch, A. G.
    De Haan, M. W.
    Jacobs, M. J. H. M.
    Schurink, G. W. H.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 56 (02) : 239 - 247