Endoscopic aneurysm sac fenestration as a treatment option for growing aneurysms due to type II endoleak or endotension

被引:13
作者
van Nes, JGH
Hendriks, JM
Tseng, LNL
van Dijk, LC
van Sambeek, MRHM
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Ctr Med, Dept Vasc Surg, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Ctr Med, Dept Radiol, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
abdominal aortic aneurysm; endovascular repair; stent-graft; endoleak; endotension; sac diameter; sac expansion; encloscopic fenestration; side branch clipping;
D O I
10.1583/05-1541R.1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate endoscopic fenestration as a treatment option for growing aneurysm due to a type 11 endoleak or endotension after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Methods: Eight patients (7 men; median age 69 years, range 55-79) who underwent "successful" EVAR were diagnosed with a growing aneurysm due to a type 11 endoleak (n=4) or endotension (n=4). Surgical intervention consisted of endoscopic fenestration of the sac and removal of all the thrombus material, preceded by clipping of the inferior mesenteric and all lumbar arteries in cases of endoleak. Fluid samples from the fenestrated aneurysm sac were analyzed for the presence of microorganisms and fibrin degradation products (FDP) and/or D-dimers. Results: The median duration of operation was 220 minutes (range 111-333). There was no perioperative mortality. In one patient, the endoscopic procedure was converted to an open fenestration procedure. Seven patients had uncomplicated follow-up and a clear decrease in the diameter of the sac; one patient was converted to open repair owing to continued sac growth despite fenestration. Bacterial cultures were negative in all patients, but high levels of FDP and/or D-climers were found in all available samples, indicating continued fibrinolysis. Conclusion: Endoscopic fenestration, with or without endoscopic clipping of all side branches, seems to be an effective, reliable and minimally invasive treatment option for patients with a growing aneurysm due to type 11 endoleak or endotension. The high levels of FDP and/or D-dimers in the aneurysm sac are suggestive of hyperfibrinolysis, which may play an important role in aneurysm growth after EVAR.
引用
收藏
页码:430 / 434
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Elective endovascular versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Systematic review of short-term results [J].
Adriaensen, MEAPM ;
Bosch, JL ;
Halpern, EF ;
Hunink, MGM ;
Gazelle, GS .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 224 (03) :739-747
[2]  
BREWSTER DC, 2004, J VASC SURG, V40, P1065
[3]   Identifying and grading factors that modify the outcome of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair [J].
Chaikof, EL ;
Fillinger, MF ;
Matsumura, JS ;
Rutherford, RB ;
White, GH ;
Blankensteijn, JD ;
Bernhard, VM ;
Harris, PL ;
Kent, KC ;
May, J ;
Veith, FJ ;
Zarins, CK .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 35 (05) :1061-1066
[4]   Late abdominal aortic aneurysm enlargement after endovascular repair with the excluder device [J].
Cho, JS ;
Dillavou, ED ;
Rhee, RY ;
Makaroun, AS .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 39 (06) :1236-1241
[5]   Which factors increase the risk of conversion to open surgery following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair? [J].
Cuypers, PWM ;
Laheij, RJF ;
Buth, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 20 (02) :183-189
[6]  
Dubenec SR, 2003, J CARDIOVASC SURG, V44, P553
[7]   Continued sac expansion in the absence of a demonstrable endoleak is an indication for secondary intervention [J].
Fisher, RK ;
Brennan, JA ;
Gilling-Smith, GL ;
Harris, PL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 20 (01) :96-98
[8]  
Gilling-Smith G, 1999, J ENDOVASC SURG, V6, P305, DOI 10.1583/1074-6218(1999)006<0305:EAEARD>2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]   Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial [J].
Greenhalgh, RM ;
Brown, LC ;
Kwong, GPS ;
Powell, JT ;
Thompson, SG .
LANCET, 2004, 364 (9437) :843-848