Improving the ROI of Software Quality Assurance Activities: An Empirical Study

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Qi [1 ]
Shu, Fengdi [2 ]
Boehm, Barry [1 ]
Wang, Qing [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, 941 W 37th Pl, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Software, Lab Int Software Technol, Beijing 100080, Peoples R China
来源
NEW MODELING CONCEPTS FOR TODAY'S SOFTWARE PROCESSES | 2010年 / 6195卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Quality Assurance; Review; Testing; Process Audit; LESSONS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Review, process audit, and testing are three main Quality Assurance activities during the software development life cycle. They complement each other to examine work products for defects and improvement opportunities to the largest extent. Understanding the effort distribution and inter-correlation among them will facilitate software organization project planning, improve the software quality within the budget and schedule and make continuous process improvement. This paper reports some empirical findings of effort distribution pattern of the three types of QA activities from a series of incremental projects in China. The result of the study gives us some implications on how to identify which type of QA activity is insufficient while others might be overdone, how to balance the effort allocation and planning for future projects, how to improve the weak part of each QA activity and finally improve the Return On Investment (ROI) of QA activities and the whole process effectiveness under the specific organization context.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / +
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An Empirical Study on Enhancing Product Quality and Customer Satisfaction Using Quality Assurance Approach in an Indian Manufacturing Industry
    Mittal, Ankesh
    Gupta, Pardeep
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCES, 2021, 6 (03) : 878 - 893
  • [22] Improving the quality of endoscopic polypectomy by introducing a colonoscopy quality assurance program
    Gado, Ahmed
    Ebeid, Basel
    Abdelmohsen, Aida
    Axon, Anthony
    ALEXANDRIA JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 49 (04) : 317 - 322
  • [23] Software quality assurance-challenges in launch vehicle projects
    Gopalan, P
    Sankari, SSU
    Kumar, DM
    Nair, RV
    DEFENCE SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2006, 56 (01) : 31 - 38
  • [24] Open Source Software (OSS) Quality Assurance: A Survey Paper
    Bahamdain, Salem S.
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE NETWORKS AND COMMUNICATIONS (FNC 2015) / THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MOBILE SYSTEMS AND PERVASIVE COMPUTING (MOBISPC 2015) AFFILIATED WORKSHOPS, 2015, 56 : 459 - 464
  • [25] Towards Quality Assurance of Software Product Lines with Adversarial Configurations
    Temple, Paul
    Acher, Mathieu
    Perrouin, Gilles
    Biggio, Battista
    Jezequel, Jean-Marc
    Roli, Fabio
    SPLC'19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 23RD INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINE CONFERENCE, VOL A, 2020, : 277 - 288
  • [26] Agile Software Methodology with Scrum for Developing Quality Assurance System
    Legowo, Mercurius Broto
    Indiarto, Budi
    Prayitno, Deden
    2019 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMPUTER AND INFORMATICS ENGINEERING (IC2IE 2019): ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ROLES IN INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION 4.0, 2019, : 104 - 109
  • [27] How to Innovate Software Quality Assurance and Testing in Large Enterprises?
    Poth, Alexander
    Heimann, Christian
    SYSTEMS, SOFTWARE AND SERVICES PROCESS IMPROVEMENT (EUROSPI 2018), 2018, 896 : 437 - 442
  • [28] Quality management activities for software architecture and software architecture process
    Hamalainen, Niina
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IASTED INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2007, : 347 - 352
  • [29] Tools and practices to software quality assurance: A systematic literature review
    Munoz, Mirna
    Mejia, Jezreel
    Ibarra, Saul
    2018 13TH IBERIAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (CISTI), 2018,
  • [30] How to teach practical Software Quality Assurance - An experience report
    Thompson, JB
    Edwards, HM
    FIRST ASIA-PACIFIC CONFERENCE ON QUALITY SOFTWARE, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 181 - 187