Research on Path-Planning Algorithm Integrating Optimization A-Star Algorithm and Artificial Potential Field Method

被引:67
作者
Liu, Lisang [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Bin [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Hui [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Univ Technol, Sch Elect Elect Engn & Phys, Fuzhou 350118, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Univ Technol, Natl Demonstrat Ctr Expt Elect Informat & Elect T, Fuzhou 350118, Peoples R China
关键词
A-star algorithm; artificial potential field method; least squares method; path planning;
D O I
10.3390/electronics11223660
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
A fusion pathfinding algorithm based on the optimized A-star algorithm, the artificial potential field method and the least squares method is proposed to meet the performance requirements of path smoothing, response speed and computation time for the path planning of home cleaning robots. The fusion algorithm improves the operation rules of the traditional A-star algorithm, enabling global path planning to be completed quickly. At the same time, the operating rules of the artificial potential field method are changed according to the path points found by the optimal A-star algorithm, thus greatly avoiding the dilemma of being trapped in local optima. Finally, the least squares method is applied to fit the complete path to obtain a smooth path trajectory. Experiments show that the fusion algorithm significantly improves pathfinding efficiency and produces smoother and more continuous paths. Through simulation comparison experiments, the optimized A-star algorithm reduced path-planning time by 60% compared to the traditional A-star algorithm and 65.2% compared to the bidirectional A-star algorithm path-planning time. The fusion algorithm reduced the path-planning time by 65.2% compared to the ant colony algorithm and 83.64% compared to the RRT algorithm path-planning time.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Chen D., 2021, J. Comput. Appl, V41, P309
[2]  
[陈海洋 Chen Haiyang], 2022, [空军工程大学学报. 自然科学版, Journal of Air Force Engineering University. Natural Science Edition], V23, P60
[3]  
Dijkstra EW., 1959, NUMER MATH, V1, P269, DOI [10.1007/BF01386390, DOI 10.1007/BF01386390]
[4]  
Gao Q., 2021, Ind. Control Comput, V34, P100, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1001-182X.2021.11.040, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1001-182X.2021.11.040]
[5]   A FORMAL BASIS FOR HEURISTIC DETERMINATION OF MINIMUM COST PATHS [J].
HART, PE ;
NILSSON, NJ ;
RAPHAEL, B .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS SCIENCE AND CYBERNETICS, 1968, SSC4 (02) :100-+
[6]  
Hen J., 2022, J GUANGXI U SCI TECH, V33, P78
[7]  
Khatib O., 1986, Adaptive and learning systems, P367, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-1895-9_26, 10.1007/978-1-4757-1895-9_26]
[8]  
Li X., 2022, Comput. Meas. Control, V30, P9
[9]  
Lin M., 2022, MECH SCI TECHNOL AER, V41, P795
[10]  
[刘翰培 Liu Hanpei], 2022, [控制工程, Control Engineering of China], V29, P33