High Dose Brachytherapy as Monotherapy for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer

被引:68
作者
Rogers, C. Leland [1 ]
Alder, Stephen C. [2 ]
Rogers, R. LeGrand [3 ]
Hopkins, Scott A. [4 ]
Platt, McKay L. [5 ]
Childs, Lane C. [4 ]
Crouch, Ronald H. [6 ]
Hansen, Roger S. [1 ]
Hayes, John K. [1 ]
机构
[1] GammaW Canc Serv, Salt Lake City, UT 84102 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Dept Family & Prevent Med, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Westen Urol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[5] Cent Utah Urol, Provo, UT USA
[6] Urol Associates, Cedar City, UT USA
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; brachytherapy; neoplasm staging; mortality; EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; PERMANENT INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY; ERECTILE FUNCTION IIEF-5; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ANDROGEN SUPPRESSION; INTERNATIONAL INDEX; RADIATION-THERAPY; SEED IMPLANTATION; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; DIAGNOSTIC-TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.050
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We evaluated our retrospective, single institution experience with high dose rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for intermediate risk prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Our cohort included 284 patients with intermediate risk prostate cancer, defined as clinical stage T2b/T2c, Gleason score 7 and/or prostate specific antigen 10 to 20 ng/ml, and 1-year minimum followup. Treatment was 2 high dose rate brachytherapy sessions at 3 fractions of 6.5 Gy each for a mean of 19 days. Prostate specific antigen failure was defined as nadir +2 ng/ml. Results: Mean followup was 35.1 months (median 31.9). Actuarial 5-year cause specific survival and clinical local control were 100%, distant-metastasis-free survival 98.8% and biochemical disease-free survival 94.4%. Clinical stage predicted biochemical disease-free survival. For stage T2a or less 5-year biochemical disease-free survival was 95.1% vs 100% for stage T2b and 77.4% for T2c (p = 0.012). Percent positive biopsy cores and prostate specific antigen nadir were also predictive. International Prostate Symptom Score results remained stable and potency was maintained in 82.6% of patients at 2 years. Pads were used for the first time after brachytherapy in 22 patients (7.7%), mostly for grade 1 incontinence (occasionally or less per week). Excluding patients with prior transurethral prostatectomy, stroke or tremor 2.5% used pads for the first time after treatment. No patient had urethral stricture. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade 1 rectal toxicity developed in 12 patients (4.2%) but not beyond grade 1. Conclusions: High dose rate brachytherapy as monotherapy is safe and effective for patients with intermediate risk prostate cancer. We recommend caution for percent positive biopsy cores exceeding 75% or clinical stage T2c. Excluding such patients the 5-year biochemical disease-free survival rate was 97.5%.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 116
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer
    Bill-Axelson, A
    Holmberg, L
    Ruutu, M
    Häggman, M
    Andersson, SO
    Bratell, S
    Spångberg, A
    Busch, C
    Nordling, S
    Garmo, H
    Palmgren, J
    Adami, HO
    Norlén, BJ
    Johansson, JE
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (19) : 1977 - 1984
  • [2] Crook J, 2001, CAN MED ASSOC J, V164, P975
  • [3] Comparison of Health-Related Quality of Life 5 Years After SPIRIT: Surgical Prostatectomy Versus Interstitial Radiation Intervention Trial
    Crook, Juanita Mary
    Gomez-Iturriaga, Alfonso
    Wallace, Kris
    Ma, Clement
    Fung, Sharon
    Alibhai, Shabbir
    Jewett, Michael
    Fleshner, Neil
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (04) : 362 - 368
  • [4] Androgen suppression and radiation vs radiation alone for prostate cancer - A randomized trial
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    Renshaw, Andrew A.
    Loffredo, Marian
    Kantoff, Philip W.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 299 (03): : 289 - 295
  • [5] Risk of Death From Prostate Cancer After Brachytherapy Alone or With Radiation, Androgen Suppression Therapy, or Both in Men With High-Risk Disease
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    Moran, Brian J.
    Braccioforte, Michelle H.
    Dosoretz, Daniel
    Salenius, Sharon
    Katin, Michael
    Ross, Rudi
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (24) : 3923 - 3928
  • [6] Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    D'Amico, AV
    Whittington, R
    Malkowicz, SB
    Schultz, D
    Blank, K
    Broderick, GA
    Tomaszewski, JE
    Renshaw, AA
    Kaplan, I
    Beard, CJ
    Wein, A
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11): : 969 - 974
  • [7] Comparison of PSA relapse-free survival in patients treated with ultra-high-dose IMRT versus combination HDR brachytherapy and IMRT
    Deutsch, Israel
    Zelefsky, Michael J.
    Zhang, Zhigang
    Mo, Qianxing
    Zaider, Marco
    Cohen, Gil'ad
    Cahlon, Oren
    Yamada, Yoshiya
    [J]. BRACHYTHERAPY, 2010, 9 (04) : 313 - 318
  • [8] High dose rate brachytherapy in combination with external beam radiotherapy in the radical treatment of prostate cancer: initial results of a randomised phase three trial
    Hoskin, Peter J.
    Motohashi, Kate
    Bownes, Peter
    Bryant, Linda
    Ostler, Peter
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 84 (02) : 114 - 120
  • [9] Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients
    Hull, GW
    Rabbani, F
    Abbas, F
    Wheeler, TM
    Kattan, MW
    Scardino, PT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (02) : 528 - 534
  • [10] Outcomes for intermediate risk prostate cancer: Are there advantages for surgery, external radiation, or brachytherapy?
    Klein, Eric A.
    Ciezki, Jay
    Kupelian, Patrick A.
    Mahadevan, Arul
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2009, 27 (01) : 67 - 71