Bystander fallow deer engage in third-party behaviour based on similarities in contestant resource-holding potential

被引:2
作者
Jennings, Domhnall J. [1 ]
Gammell, Martin P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Biol Sci, Belfast, North Ireland
[2] Galway Mayo Inst Technol, Sch Sci & Comp, Galway, Ireland
关键词
assessment; body size; bystander; capital breeder; contest theory; fallow deer; resource-holding potential; somatic cost; third-party behaviour; weapon size; REPRODUCTIVE EFFORT; DAMA-DAMA; RED DEER; FIGHTING ABILITY; BODY-WEIGHT; ANTLER SIZE; SEQUENTIAL ASSESSMENT; PHENOTYPIC QUALITY; DOMINANCE RANK; LIFE-HISTORY;
D O I
10.1016/j.anbehav.2022.06.005
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Competitive dyadic interactions frequently attract the attention of bystanders that follow and disrupt the ongoing contest. The motivation for bystanders to engage in such third-party behaviour is considered by several different theoretical approaches; one such model argues that bystanders intervene to prevent subordinates from gaining a winner effect, thereby becoming a threat to the individual's dominant status within the group. This study investigates the role of contestant morphology as a motivating factor in initiating third-party behaviour. We investigated whether two correlates of resource-holding potential, prerut body weight and antler weight, were associated with third-party behaviour in rutting male fallow deer, Dama dama. In addition, we examined whether a third factor, reproductive effort (weight loss during the rut) was associated with third-party behaviour. There was a positive relationship between antler weight and the number of times individual males experienced third-party behaviour during contests. This relationship was not evident for either prerut weight or weight loss. An analysis of third -party behaviour showed that as the difference in both prerut and antler weight between the competing males declined, there was an increase in the probability that the dyad would experience third-party behaviour. However, there was no such association between the difference in weight loss between contestants and third-party behaviour. Thus, dyads of males closely matched in terms of individual quality were likely to experience third-party behaviour. We show for the first time that morphological traits associated with resource-holding potential are important cues used by rivals as a basis for engaging in third-party behaviour.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 41
页数:9
相关论文
共 97 条
  • [81] Gradually escalating fights and displays: the cumulative assessment model
    Payne, RJH
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1998, 56 : 651 - 662
  • [82] Peake TM, 2004, LEARN BEHAV, V32, P114
  • [83] Sexual selection and social rank in bighorn rams
    Pelletier, F
    Festa-Bianchet, M
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2006, 71 : 649 - 655
  • [84] The Behavior of Wild White-Faced Capuchins: Demography, Life History, Social Relationships, and Communication
    Perry, Susan
    [J]. ADVANCES IN THE STUDY OF BEHAVIOR, VOL 44, 2012, 44 : 135 - 181
  • [85] COMPETITION, COALITIONS AND CANINE SIZE IN PRIMATES
    PLAVCAN, JM
    VANSCHAIK, CP
    KAPPELER, PM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN EVOLUTION, 1995, 28 (03) : 245 - 276
  • [86] Red deer stags use formants as assessment cues during intrasexual agonistic interactions
    Reby, D
    McComb, K
    Cargnelutti, B
    Darwin, C
    Fitch, WT
    Clutton-Brock, T
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2005, 272 (1566) : 941 - 947
  • [87] Riechert Susan E., 1998, P64
  • [88] Searcy W.A., 2005, EVOLUTION ANIMAL COM
  • [89] Sherratt TN, 2013, ANIMAL CONTESTS, P33
  • [90] Evolutionary forces favoring intragroup coalitions among spotted hyenas and other animals
    Smith, Jennifer E.
    Van Horn, Russell C.
    Powning, Katherine S.
    Cole, Alison R.
    Graham, Katharine E.
    Memenis, Sandra K.
    Holekamp, Kay E.
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2010, 21 (02) : 284 - 303