Endoscopic papillectomy for neoplastic ampullary lesions: A systematic review with pooled analysis

被引:58
作者
Spadaccini, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Fugazza, Alessandro [1 ]
Frazzoni, Leonardo [3 ]
Di Leo, Milena [1 ]
Auriemma, Francesco [4 ]
Carrara, Silvia [1 ]
Maselli, Roberta [1 ]
Galtieri, Piera Alessia [1 ]
Chandrasekar, Viveksandeep Thoguluva [5 ,6 ]
Fuccio, Lorenzo [3 ]
Aljahdli, Emad [7 ]
Hassan, Cesare [8 ]
Sharma, Prateek [5 ,6 ]
Anderloni, Andrea [1 ]
Repici, Alessandro [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Humanitas Clin & Res Ctr, Digest Endoscopy Unit, Div Gastroenterol, Milan, Italy
[2] Humanitas Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Bologna, S Orsola Malpighi Hosp, Dept Med & Surg Sci, Bologna, Italy
[4] Humanitas Mater Domini, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Castellanza, Italy
[5] Univ Kansas, Sch Med, Kansas City, KS USA
[6] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Kansas City, KS USA
[7] King Abdul Aziz Univ Hosp, Gastroenterol Unit, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[8] Nuovo Regina Margherita Hosp, Digest Endoscopy Unit, Rome, Italy
关键词
ERCP; duodenoscope; adenoma; ampullary lesion; papillectomy; FAMILIAL ADENOMATOUS POLYPOSIS; PANCREATIC STENT PLACEMENT; SNARE EXCISION; SURGICAL AMPULLECTOMY; VILLOUS TUMORS; RESECTION; COMPLICATIONS; PAPILLA; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1177/2050640619868367
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) is a viable therapy in ampullary lesions (AL). Many series have reported low morbidity and acceptable outcomes. We performed a systematic review with pooled analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of EP for AL. Electronic databases (Medline, Scopus and EMBASE) were searched up to September 2018. Studies that included patients with endoscopically resected AL were eligible. The rate of adverse events (AEs; primary outcome) and the rates of both technical and clinical efficacy outcomes were pooled by means of a random- or fixed-effects model to obtain a proportion with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Twenty-nine studies were included (1751 patients). The overall AE rate was 24.9%. The post-procedural pancreatitis rate was 11.9%, with the only factor affecting this outcome being prophylactic pancreatic stenting. The complete resection rate was 94.2%, with a rate of oncologically curative resection of 87.1%. The recurrence rate was 11.8% (follow-up: 9.6-84.5 months). EP is a relatively safe and effective option for AL. Our study might definitively suggest the protective role of prophylactic pancreatic stenting against post-procedural pancreatitis.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 51
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Outcomes of endoscopic papillectomy in elderly patients with ampullary adenoma or early carcinoma
    Nguyen, N.
    Shah, J. N.
    Binmoeller, K. F.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 42 (11) : 975 - 977
  • [32] Therapeutic Outcomes and Risk Factors for Complications of Endoscopic Papillectomy: A Retrospective Analysis of a Single-Center Study
    Jiang, Lei
    Chai, Ningli
    Li, Mingyan
    Linghu, Enqiang
    THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2021, 17 : 531 - 541
  • [33] Endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary adenoma and early adenocarcinoma: Analysis of factors related to treatment outcome and long-term prognosis
    Kawashima, Hiroki
    Ohno, Eizaburo
    Ishikawa, Takuya
    Iida, Tadashi
    Tanaka, Hiroyuki
    Furukawa, Kazuhiro
    Nakamura, Masanao
    Honda, Takashi
    Hashimoto, Senju
    Itoh, Akihiro
    Ishigami, Masatoshi
    Hirooka, Yoshiki
    Fujishiro, Mitsuhiro
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 33 (05) : 858 - 869
  • [34] The efficacy of prophylactic pancreatic stents against complications of post-endoscopic papillectomy or endoscopic ampullectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Yining
    Qi, Miao
    Hao, Yuanzhen
    Hong, Junbo
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 12
  • [35] Management after Endoscopic Snare Papillectomy for Ampullary Adenomas
    Kim, Ji Hun
    Kim, Jin Hong
    Hwang, Jae Chul
    Yoo, Byung Moo
    Moon, Jong Ho
    Lee, Dong Ki
    Kim, Ho Gak
    Cho, Young Deok
    Lee, Don Haeng
    Park, Sang Heum
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 60 (126) : 1268 - 1273
  • [36] IMPACT OF TECHNICAL MODIFICATION OF ENDOSCOPIC PAPILLECTOMY FOR AMPULLARY NEOPLASM ON THE OCCURRENCE OF COMPLICATIONS
    Ito, Kei
    Fujita, Naotaka
    Noda, Yutaka
    Kobayashi, Go
    Obana, Takashi
    Horaguchi, Jun
    Koshita, Shinsuke
    Kanno, Yoshihide
    Ogawa, Takahisa
    Kato, Yusuke
    Yamashita, Yasunobu
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 24 (01) : 30 - 35
  • [37] Is Endoscopic Papillectomy Safe for Ampullary Adenomas with High-Grade Dysplasia?
    Kim, Ji Hun
    Kim, Jin Hong
    Han, Jae Ho
    Yoo, Byung Moo
    Kim, Myung Wook
    Kim, Wook Hwan
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (09) : 2547 - 2554
  • [38] Cold-snare endoscopic resection of non-ampullary duodenal adenomas: Systematic review and pooled-analysis
    Spadaccini, Marco
    Alfarone, Ludovico
    Facciorusso, Antonio
    Gkolfakis, Paraskevas
    Chandrasekar, Viveksandeep Thoguluva
    Fugazza, Alessandro
    Colombo, Matteo
    Capogreco, Antonio
    Massimi, Davide
    Carrara, Silvia
    Alkandari, Asma
    Bhandari, Pradeep
    Maselli, Roberta
    Hassan, Cesare
    Repici, Alessandro
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2024, 56 (04) : 656 - 662
  • [39] Endoscopic Papillectomy for Benign Ampullary Neoplasms: How Can Treatment Outcome Be Predicted?
    Ahn, Dong-Won
    Ryu, Ji Kon
    Kim, Jaihwan
    Yoon, Won Jae
    Lee, Sang Hyub
    Kim, Yong-Tae
    Yoon, Yong Bum
    GUT AND LIVER, 2013, 7 (02) : 239 - 245
  • [40] Endoscopic Papillectomy Is Effective and Safe for Ampullary Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Comprehensive Review of the Available Literature
    Abbas, Daniyal
    Abdallah, Mohamed
    Suryawanshi, Gaurav
    Osman, Karim
    McDonald, Nicholas
    Bilal, Mohammad
    Azeem, Nabeel
    TECHNIQUES AND INNOVATIONS IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 24 (04): : 331 - 339