Endoscopic papillectomy for neoplastic ampullary lesions: A systematic review with pooled analysis

被引:56
|
作者
Spadaccini, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Fugazza, Alessandro [1 ]
Frazzoni, Leonardo [3 ]
Di Leo, Milena [1 ]
Auriemma, Francesco [4 ]
Carrara, Silvia [1 ]
Maselli, Roberta [1 ]
Galtieri, Piera Alessia [1 ]
Chandrasekar, Viveksandeep Thoguluva [5 ,6 ]
Fuccio, Lorenzo [3 ]
Aljahdli, Emad [7 ]
Hassan, Cesare [8 ]
Sharma, Prateek [5 ,6 ]
Anderloni, Andrea [1 ]
Repici, Alessandro [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Humanitas Clin & Res Ctr, Digest Endoscopy Unit, Div Gastroenterol, Milan, Italy
[2] Humanitas Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Bologna, S Orsola Malpighi Hosp, Dept Med & Surg Sci, Bologna, Italy
[4] Humanitas Mater Domini, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Castellanza, Italy
[5] Univ Kansas, Sch Med, Kansas City, KS USA
[6] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Kansas City, KS USA
[7] King Abdul Aziz Univ Hosp, Gastroenterol Unit, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[8] Nuovo Regina Margherita Hosp, Digest Endoscopy Unit, Rome, Italy
关键词
ERCP; duodenoscope; adenoma; ampullary lesion; papillectomy; FAMILIAL ADENOMATOUS POLYPOSIS; PANCREATIC STENT PLACEMENT; SNARE EXCISION; SURGICAL AMPULLECTOMY; VILLOUS TUMORS; RESECTION; COMPLICATIONS; PAPILLA; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1177/2050640619868367
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) is a viable therapy in ampullary lesions (AL). Many series have reported low morbidity and acceptable outcomes. We performed a systematic review with pooled analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of EP for AL. Electronic databases (Medline, Scopus and EMBASE) were searched up to September 2018. Studies that included patients with endoscopically resected AL were eligible. The rate of adverse events (AEs; primary outcome) and the rates of both technical and clinical efficacy outcomes were pooled by means of a random- or fixed-effects model to obtain a proportion with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Twenty-nine studies were included (1751 patients). The overall AE rate was 24.9%. The post-procedural pancreatitis rate was 11.9%, with the only factor affecting this outcome being prophylactic pancreatic stenting. The complete resection rate was 94.2%, with a rate of oncologically curative resection of 87.1%. The recurrence rate was 11.8% (follow-up: 9.6-84.5 months). EP is a relatively safe and effective option for AL. Our study might definitively suggest the protective role of prophylactic pancreatic stenting against post-procedural pancreatitis.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 51
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Endoscopic papillectomy for early ampullary tumors: long-term results from a large multicenter prospective study
    Napoleon, Bertrand
    Gincul, Rodica
    Ponchon, Thierry
    Berthiller, Julien
    Escourrou, Jean
    Canard, Jean-Marc
    Boyer, Jean
    Barthet, Marc
    Ponsot, Philippe
    Laugier, Rene
    Helbert, Thierry
    Coumaros, Dimitri
    Scoazec, Jean-Yves
    Mion, Francois
    Saurin, Jean-Christophe
    ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 46 (02) : 127 - 134
  • [22] Ampullary Adenoma Treated by Endoscopic Double-Snare Retracting Papillectomy
    Soma, Hiromitsu
    Miyata, Naoteru
    Hozawa, Shigenari
    Higuchi, Hajime
    Yamagishi, Yoshiyuki
    Nakamura, Yuji
    Saeki, Keita
    Kameyama, Kaori
    Masugi, Yohei
    Yahagi, Naohisa
    Kanai, Takanori
    GUT AND LIVER, 2015, 9 (05) : 689 - 692
  • [23] Ampullary neuroendocrine tumor diagnosed by endoscopic papillectomy in previously confirmed ampullary adenoma
    Lee, Seoung Ho
    Lee, Tae Hoon
    Jang, Si-Hyong
    Choi, Chi Young
    Lee, Won Myung
    Min, Ji Hey
    Cho, Hyun Deuk
    Park, Sang-Heum
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 22 (13) : 3687 - 3692
  • [24] Endoscopic papillectomy or pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary lesions: a single center retrospective cohort study
    Seyfried, Steffen
    Kaehler, Georg
    Belle, Sebastian
    Hirsch, Daniela
    Reissfelder, Christoph
    Rahbari, Nuh
    Hardt, Julia
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 57 (11) : 1381 - 1389
  • [25] Ampullary neuroendocrine tumor diagnosed by endoscopic papillectomy in previously confirmed ampullary adenoma
    Seoung Ho Lee
    Tae Hoon Lee
    Si-Hyong Jang
    Chi Young Choi
    Won Myung Lee
    Ji Hey Min
    Hyun Deuk Cho
    Sang-Heum Park
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2016, (13) : 3687 - 3692
  • [26] Endoscopic Papillectomy for Ampullary Gangliocytic Paraganglioma: A Case Series and Literature Review
    Takada, Yoshihisa
    Ishikawa, Takuya
    Yamao, Kentaro
    Mizutani, Yasuyuki
    Iida, Tadashi
    Uetsuki, Kota
    Nakamura, Masanao
    Furukawa, Kazuhiro
    Yamamura, Takeshi
    Kawashima, Hiroki
    INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2024, : 1151 - 1159
  • [27] Endoscopic versus surgical treatment of ampullary adenomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mendonca, Ernesto Quaresma
    Bernardo, Wanderley Marques
    Hourneaux de Moura, Eduardo Guimaraes
    Chaves, Dalton Marques
    Kondo, Andre
    Cheng Tao Pu, Leonardo Zorron
    Baracat, Felipe Iankelevich
    CLINICS, 2016, 71 (01) : 28 - 35
  • [28] Clinical outcomes: endoscopic resection of duodenal ampullary lesions
    Woo, Stephanie M.
    Real, Mark J.
    Will, Brett M.
    Kim, Eric J.
    Chou, Jiling
    Alsaiari, Ahmed A.
    Nakshabandi, Ahmad
    Chalhoub, Walid M.
    Haddad, Nadim G.
    TRANSLATIONAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 8
  • [29] New experience of endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary neoplasms
    Li, Shuling
    Wang, Zikai
    Cai, Fengchun
    Linghu, Enqiang
    Sun, Gang
    Wang, Xiangdong
    Meng, Jiangyun
    Du, Hong
    Yang, Yunsheng
    Li, Wen
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (02): : 612 - 619
  • [30] Advantage of endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary tumors as an alternative treatment for pancreatoduodenectomy
    Abe, Shohei
    Sakai, Arata
    Masuda, Atsuhiro
    Miki, Mika
    Harada, Yoshiyuki
    Nagao, Kae
    Inomata, Noriko
    Kohashi, Shinya
    Uemura, Hisahiro
    Masuda, Shigeto
    Ashina, Shigeto
    Gonda, Masanori
    Yamakawa, Kohei
    Tsujimae, Masahiro
    Yamada, Yasutaka
    Tanaka, Takeshi
    Kobayashi, Takashi
    Nakano, Ryota
    Shiomi, Hideyuki
    Tsugawa, Daisuke
    Yanagimoto, Hiroaki
    Ajiki, Tetsuo
    Kanzawa, Maki
    Fukumoto, Takumi
    Itoh, Tomoo
    Kodama, Yuzo
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)