Biopsy Specimens Obtained With Small-Caliber Endoscopes Have Comparable Diagnostic Performances Than Those Obtained With Conventional Endoscopes A Prospective Study on 1335 Specimens

Background and Study Aims: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) can be routinely performed via a nasal route in adults by using small-caliber endoscopes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of biopsy specimens obtained with small forceps for histologic diagnosis. Patients and Methods: From January to April 2007, we prospectively compared all biopsy specimens obtained, during conventional EGD (8.8-mm-diameter endoscope), with (CS-EGD) or without sedation (C-EGD), and transnasal or transoral-EGD (4.9-mm-diameter endoscope) without sedation (T-EGD). All biopsy specimens were blindly evaluated by a pathologist. For each specimen, were recorded: site, biopsy size and thickness, type of lesion (focal or diffuse), and in case of focal abnormalities described by the endoscopist, presence of the histologic lesions in the targeted biopsies. Results: One thousand and thirty-five biopsy specimens were obtained from 300 procedures (109 T-EGD, 48 C-EGD, and 143 CS-EGD): 983 biopsy specimens were untargeted (esophagus and cardia in 21%, stomach in 85% and duodenum in 84%) and 352 biopsy specimens were targeted to focal lesions (esophagus and cardia in 79%, stomach in 15%, and duodenum in 16%). The mean size of specimens was 1.8, 2, 2.2 mm diameter, in T-EGD, C-EGD, and CS-EGD groups, respectively (P < 0.001). The whole thickness of mucosa was present in 68%. 84%, 71% of the cases among T-EGD. C-EGD, and CS-EGD groups, respectively (P = 0.9). There was no significant difference in the rate of definitive histologic diagnosis from targeted or nontargeted biopsies according to the endoscopic procedure. Conclusions: Biopsy specimens obtained during EGD with small forceps are as effective for diagnosis as those obtained with standard forceps.