Digital radiography: The balance between image quality and required radiation dose

被引:153
作者
Uffmann, Martin [1 ]
Schaefer-Prokop, Cornelia [2 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Radiol, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Acad Med Ctr, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Digital radiography; Computed radiography; Image quality; Radiation exposure; Dose indicator; FLAT-PANEL-DETECTOR; X-RAY-SPECTRUM; CHEST RADIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY; CESIUM IODIDE; MANAGEMENT; OPTIMIZATION; SCREEN; FILM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.060
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Although the transition from conventional screen-film imaging to digital image acquisition has been almost completed during the last couple of years, examination parameters, such as tube voltage, tube current, and filtration have been adopted from screen-film technology without further adjustments. Digital systems, however, are characterised by their flexibility: the acquisition dose can be reduced at the expense of image quality and vice versa. The imaging parameters must be optimised according to the best performance of a particular system. The traditional means of dose containment, such as positioning and collimation, are as valid for digital techniques as they were for conventional techniques. Digital techniques increasingly offer options for dose reduction. At the same time, there is a risk of substantially increasing the patient dose, possibly unawares, due to the lack of visual control. Therefore, implementation of dose indicators and dose monitoring is mandatory for digital radiography. The use of image quality classes according to the dose requirements of given clinical indications are a further step toward modern radiation protection. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 208
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[21]   Tradeoffs between image quality and dose [J].
Seibert, JA .
PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2004, 34 (Suppl 3) :S183-S195
[22]   Flat-panel-detector chest radiography: Effect of tube voltage on image quality [J].
Uffmann, M ;
Neitzel, U ;
Prokop, M ;
Kabalan, N ;
Weber, M ;
Herold, CJ ;
Schaefer-Prokop, C .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 235 (02) :642-650
[23]  
Wall B.F., 2004, Eur. Radiol. Suppl, V14, P66, DOI [10.1007/s10406-004-0010-8, DOI 10.1007/S10406-004-0010-8]
[24]   Central dose data management and analysis in IT-driven radiation protection strategies [J].
Ward, M ;
Hughes, D ;
Connolly, P ;
Moores, BM .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 114 (1-3) :135-142
[25]   Comparison of doses for bedside examinations of the chest with conventional screen-film and computed radiography: Results of a randomized controlled trial [J].
Weatherburn, GC ;
Bryan, S ;
Davies, JG .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 (03) :707-712
[26]   Computed radiography: a higher dose? [J].
Willis, CE .
PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2002, 32 (10) :745-750