Evaluation of miscanthus productivity and water use efficiency in southeastern United States

被引:14
作者
Maleski, Jerome J. [1 ]
Bosch, David D. [1 ]
Anderson, Ray G. [2 ]
Coffin, Alisa W. [1 ]
Anderson, William F. [3 ]
Strickland, Timothy C. [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Southeast Watershed Res Lab, 2316 Rainwater Rd, Tifton, GA 31793 USA
[2] USDA ARS, US Salin Lab, Agr Water Use Efficiency & Salin Unit, 450 W Big Springs Rd, Riverside, CA 92507 USA
[3] USDA ARS, Crop Genet & Breeding Res Unit, 115 Coastal Way, Tifton, GA 31793 USA
关键词
Miscanthus; Eddy covariance; Evapotranspiration; Water use; Soil carbon; NET ECOSYSTEM EXCHANGE; CARBON-DIOXIDE EXCHANGE; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; BIOENERGY CROPS; ENERGY-BALANCE; SWITCHGRASS; PARAMETERIZATION; FEEDSTOCKS; MITIGATION; GENOTYPES;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.128
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Second generation biofuels, such as perennial grasses, have potential to provide biofuel feedstock while growing on degraded land with minimal inputs. Perennial grasses have been reported to sequester large amounts of soil organic carbon (SOC) in the Midwestern United States (USA). However, there has been little work on biofuel and carbon sequestration potential of perennial grasses in the Southeastern US. Biofuel productivity for dryland Miscanthus x gigantus and irrigated maize in Georgia, USA were quantified using eddy covariance observations of evapotranspiration (ET) and net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of carbon. Miscanthus biomass yield was 15.54 Mg ha(-1) in 2015 and 11.80 Mg ha(-1) in 2016, while maize produced 30.20 Mg ha(-1) of biomass in 2016. Carbon budgets indicated that both miscanthus and maize fields lost carbon over the experiment. The miscanthus field lost 5 Mg C ha(-1) in both 2015 and 2016 while the maize field lost 1.37 Mg C ha(-1) for the single year of study. Eddy covariance measurement indicated that for 2016 the miscanthus crop evapotranspired 598 mm and harvest water use efficiencies ranged from 6.95 to 13.84 kg C ha(-1) mm(-1). Maize evapotranspired 659 mm with a harvest water use efficiency of 19.12 kg C ha(-1) mm(-1). While biomass yields and gross primary production were relatively high, high ecosystem respiration rates resulted in a loss of ecosystem carbon. Relatively low biomass production, low water use efficiency and high respiration for Miscanthus x gigantus in this experiment suggest that this strain of miscanthus may not be well-suited for dryland production under the environmental conditions found in South Georgia USA. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1125 / 1134
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Remote Sensing of Water Use Efficiency and Terrestrial Drought Recovery across the Contiguous United States
    Ahmadi, Behzad
    Ahmadalipour, Ali
    Tootle, Glenn
    Moradkhani, Hamid
    REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (06)
  • [12] Water use efficiency in a vineyard and its relationship with soil porosity
    Melendres, Aaron I.
    Zermena, Alejandro
    Ramirez, Homero
    Omar Cardenas, Jose
    Cadena, Martin
    TECNOLOGIA Y CIENCIAS DEL AGUA, 2017, 8 (05) : 57 - 69
  • [13] Improving productivity and water use efficiency by intercropping cactus and millet
    Souza, Marcondes de Sa
    Araujo Jr, George do Nascimento
    Jardim, Alexandre Manicoba da Rosa Ferraz
    de Souza, Carlos Andre Alves
    Pinheiro, Antonio Gebson
    de Souza, Luciana Sandra Bastos
    Salvador, Kaique Renan da Silva
    Leite, Renan Matheus Cordeiro
    Alves, Cleber Pereira
    da Silva, Thieres George Freire
    IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE, 2023, 72 (04) : 982 - 998
  • [14] A Multiregional Input-Output Analysis of Water Withdrawals in the Southeastern United States
    Sheng, Di
    Owen, Stephanie
    Lambert, Dayton M.
    English, Burton C.
    Menard, Robert J.
    Hughes, David W.
    He-Lambert, Lixia
    Clark, Christopher D.
    REVIEW OF REGIONAL STUDIES, 2019, 49 (02) : 323 - 350
  • [15] A review of remote sensing estimation of crop water productivity: definition, methodology, scale, and evaluation
    Cheng, Minghan
    Yin, Dameng
    Wu, Wenbin
    Cui, Ningbo
    Nie, Chenwei
    Shi, Lei
    Liu, Shuaibing
    Yu, Xun
    Bai, Yi
    Liu, Yadong
    Zhu, Yuqin
    Jin, Xiuliang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 44 (16) : 5033 - 5068
  • [16] Evapotranspiration, water use efficiency, and energy partitioning of a mature switchgrass stand
    Eichelmann, Elke
    Wagner-Riddle, Claudia
    Warland, Jon
    Deen, Bill
    Voroney, Paul
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2016, 217 : 108 - 119
  • [17] A Review of the United States' Past and Projected Water Use
    Perrone, Debra
    Hornberger, George
    van Vliet, Oscar
    van der Velde, Marijn
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2015, 51 (05): : 1183 - 1191
  • [18] Evaluation of the most proper management scale on water use efficiency and water productivity: A case study of the Heihe River Basin, China
    Zhou, Qing
    Zhang, Yali
    Wu, Feng
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2021, 246
  • [19] Water use efficiency of a rice paddy field in Liaohe Delta, Northeast China
    Wang, Yu
    Zhou, Li
    Jia, Qingyu
    Yu, Wenying
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2017, 187 : 222 - 231
  • [20] Biogeochemical consequences of regional land use change to a biofuel crop in the southeastern United States
    Duval, Benjamin D.
    Hartman, Melannie
    Marx, Ernest
    Parton, William J.
    Long, Stephen P.
    DeLucia, Evan H.
    ECOSPHERE, 2015, 6 (12):