Remifentanil, fentanyl, and cardiac surgery: A double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial of costs and outcomes

被引:82
作者
Myles, PS
Hunt, JO
Fletcher, H
Watts, J
Bain, D
Silvers, A
Buckland, MR
机构
[1] Alfred Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Pain Management, Prahran, Vic 3181, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Dept Anaesthesia, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Ctr Hlth Program Evaluat, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-200210000-00004
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Remifentanil may be beneficial in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery, by promoting hemodynamic stability, reducing drug requirements, and attenuating the neurohumoral "stress response." We enrolled 77 cardiac surgical patients in a double-blinded, randomized trial and randomly allocated them to one of three groups: remifentanil infusion at 0.83 mug . kg(-1) . min(-1) (Group R); fentanyl bolus, small dose, at 12 mug/kg (Group FLD); and fentanyl bolus, moderate dose, at 24 mug/kg (Group FMD). We found a significant difference in the median time to tracheal extubation: Group FLD, 6.5 h; Group R, 7.3 h; and Group FMD, 9.7 h (P = 0.025). Group R patients had similar times to those of Groups FLD (P = 0.14) and FMD (P = 0.30). Group FLD patients had a longer length of hospital stay (P = 0.030). Patients in Group R had a significantly infrequent rate of hypertension but a frequent rate of hypotension (P < 0.01). The urinary cortisol excretion was larger in Group FLD patients (P < 0.0005), and urine flow was smaller (P < 0.0005). Remifentanil was associated with a propofol dose reduction (P = 0.0005) and a concomitant higher bispectral index (P = 0.032). Three Group FLD patients, but none in groups FMD and R, had postoperative myocardial infarctions (P = 0.032). Remifentanil has larger drug acquisition costs but does not increase the total hospital costs associated with cardiac surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:805 / 812
页数:8
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Early tracheal extubation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery reduces costs and improves resource use - A prospective, randomized, controlled trial [J].
Cheng, DCH ;
Karski, J ;
Peniston, C ;
Raveendran, G ;
Asokumar, B ;
Carroll, J ;
David, T ;
Sandler, A .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 85 (06) :1300-1310
[2]  
Cheng DCH, 2001, ANESTH ANALG, V92, P1094
[3]   Computer simulation of changes in nursing productivity from early tracheal extubation of coronary artery bypass graft patients [J].
Dexter, F ;
Macario, A ;
Dexter, EU .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1998, 10 (07) :593-598
[4]   Remifentanil and pulmonary extraction during and after cardiac anesthesia [J].
Duthie, DJR ;
Stevens, JJWM ;
Doyle, AR ;
Baddoo, HHK ;
Gupta, SK ;
Muir, KT ;
Kirkham, AJT .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 84 (04) :740-744
[5]   A comparison of fentanyl, sufentanil, and remifentanil for fast-track cardiac anesthesia [J].
Engoren, M ;
Luther, G ;
Fenn-Buderer, N .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2001, 93 (04) :859-864
[6]   A SHARPER BONFERRONI PROCEDURE FOR MULTIPLE TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE [J].
HOCHBERG, Y .
BIOMETRIKA, 1988, 75 (04) :800-802
[7]  
Howie MB, 2001, ANESTH ANALG, V92, P1084
[8]  
HUG CC, 1994, ANESTHESIA, P1757
[9]  
JACKSON T, 1999, CASEMIX Q, V1, P36
[10]   Hemodynamic effects, myocardial ischemia, and timing of tracheal extubation with propofol-based anesthesia for cardiac surgery [J].
Myles, PS ;
Buckland, MR ;
Weeks, AM ;
Bujor, MA ;
McRae, R ;
Langley, M ;
Moloney, JT ;
Hunt, JO ;
Davis, BB .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 84 (01) :12-19