Tools for consensus analysis of experts' contours for radiotherapy structure definitions

被引:89
作者
Allozi, Rawon
Li, X. Allen [2 ]
White, Julia [2 ]
Apte, Aditya
Tai, An [2 ]
Michalski, Jeff M.
Bosch, Walter R.
El Naqa, Issam [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Med Coll Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
关键词
Structure definition; Radiotherapy treatment planning; Experts' consensus; Statistical modeling; Software tools; TARGET; DELINEATION; AGREEMENT; PROSTATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2010.06.009
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: To demonstrate and examine the ability of a newly developed software tool to estimate and analyze consensus contours from manually created contours by expert radiation oncologists. Material and methods: Several statistical methods and a graphical user interface were developed. For evaluation purposes, we used three breast cancer CT scans from the RTOG Breast Cancer Atlas Project. Specific structures were contoured before and after the experts' consensus panel meeting. Differences in the contours were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively by the consensus software tool. Estimates of consensus contours were analyzed for the different structures and Dice-similarity and Dice-Jaccard coefficients were used for comparative evaluation. Results: Based on kappa statistics, highest levels of agreement were seen in the left-breast, lumpectomy, and heart. Significant improvements between pre- and post-consensus contours were seen in delineation of the chestwall and breasts while significant variations were noticed in the supraclavicular and internal mammary nodes. Dice calculations for all pre-consensus STAPLE estimations and final consensus panel structures reached 0.80 or greater for the heart, left/right-breast, case-A lumpectomy, and chestwall. Conclusions: Using the consensus software tool incorporating STAPLE estimates provided the ability to create contours similar to the ones generated by expert physicians. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 97 (2010) 572-578
引用
收藏
页码:572 / 578
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, PRESCRIBING RECORDIN
[3]   Data collection in radiology research [J].
Crewson, PE ;
Applegate, KE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 177 (04) :755-761
[4]   CERR: A computational environment for radiotherapy research [J].
Deasy, JO ;
Blanco, AI ;
Clark, VH .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (05) :979-985
[5]   MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA [J].
LANDIS, JR ;
KOCH, GG .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) :159-174
[6]   VARIATION IN THE DEFINITION OF CLINICAL TARGET VOLUMES FOR PELVIC NODAL CONFORMAL RADIATION THERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER [J].
Lawton, Colleen A. F. ;
Michalski, Jeff ;
El-Naqa, Issam ;
Kuban, Deborah ;
Lee, W. Robert ;
Rosenthal, Seth A. ;
Zietman, Anthony ;
Sandler, Howard ;
Shipley, William ;
Ritter, Mark ;
Valicenti, Richard ;
Catton, Charles ;
Roach, Mack, III ;
Pisansky, Thomas M. ;
Seider, Michael .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 74 (02) :377-382
[7]   VARIABILITY OF TARGET AND NORMAL STRUCTURE DELINEATION FOR BREAST CANCER RADIOTHERAPY: AN RTOG MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL AND MULTIOBSERVER STUDY [J].
Li, X. Allen ;
Tai, An ;
Arthur, Douglas W. ;
Buchholz, Thomas A. ;
Macdonald, Shannon ;
Marks, Lawrence B. ;
Moran, Jean M. ;
Pierce, Lori J. ;
Rabinovitch, Rachel ;
Taghian, Alphonse ;
Vicini, Frank ;
Woodward, Wendy ;
White, Julia R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 73 (03) :944-951
[8]  
MICHALSKI JM, 2009, INT J RAD ONCOL BIOL
[9]  
MYERSON RJ, 2008, INT J RAD ONCOL BIOL
[10]   A method to calculate coverage probability from uncertainties in radiotherapy via a statistical shape model [J].
Price, G. J. ;
Moore, C. J. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2007, 52 (07) :1947-1965