The contributions of strategy use to working memory span: A comparison of strategy assessment methods

被引:115
作者
Dunlosky, John
Kane, Michael J.
机构
[1] Kent State Univ, Dept Psychol, Kent, OH 44242 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Greensboro, NC 27412 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/17470210600926075
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In two experiments, we tested whether individual differences in strategy production account for individual differences in performance on a working memory span task. We measured the strategies used during a standard experimenter-paced operation span (OSPAN) task by having participants make both set-by-set reports of strategy use for individual item sets and global reports of strategy use. In Experiment 1, although normatively effective strategies were self-reported on only a small proportion of OSPAN sets, individual differences in effective strategy use correlated with span performance. Experiment 2 replicated this outcome using a sample of 100 participants but, as important, it demonstrated that individual differences in effective strategy use did not mediate the relationship between OSPAN and measures of verbal ability. Discussion focuses on the interpretation of strategy-span relationships and the relative utility of general reports of strategy use versus the set-by-set reports introduced here for the OSPAN task.
引用
收藏
页码:1227 / 1245
页数:19
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Baddeley A., 2000, The Oxford Handbook of Memory, P77
[2]  
Berger F.R., 1990, AIR FORCE OFFICER QU
[3]   Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide [J].
Conway, ARA ;
Kane, MJ ;
Bunting, MF ;
Hambrick, DZ ;
Wilhelm, O ;
Engle, RW .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2005, 12 (05) :769-786
[4]   Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence [J].
Conway, ARA ;
Kane, MJ ;
Engle, RW .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2003, 7 (12) :547-552
[5]  
Cowan N, 2005, WORKING MEMORY CAPAC
[6]   Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis [J].
Daneman, M ;
Merikle, PM .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1996, 3 (04) :422-433
[7]   Causes and constraints of the shift-to-easier-materials effect in the control of study [J].
Dunlosky, J ;
Thiede, KW .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2004, 32 (05) :779-788
[8]   Measuring strategy production during associative learning: The relative utility of concurrent versus retrospective reports [J].
Dunlosky, J ;
Hertzog, C .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2001, 29 (02) :247-253
[9]  
Ekstrom R. B., 1976, KIT FACTOR REFERENCE
[10]  
Engle R.W., 1999, MODELS WORKING MEMOR, P102, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139174909.007