The Timing of Utterance Planning in Task-Oriented Dialogue: Evidence from a Novel List-Completion Paradigm

被引:45
作者
Barthel, Mathias [1 ]
Sauppe, Sebastian [1 ,2 ]
Levinson, Stephen C. [1 ,3 ]
Meyer, Antje S. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Psycholinguist, Language & Cognit Dept, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Zurich, Dept Comparat Linguist, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Max Planck Inst Psycholinguist, Psychol Language Dept, Nijmegen, Netherlands
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2016年 / 7卷
关键词
timing of turn-taking; task-oriented dialogue; prediction; production; planning; eye-movements; VISUAL WORLD PARADIGM; LANGUAGE PRODUCTION; TURN-TAKING; TIME-COURSE; LEXICAL ACCESS; EYE-MOVEMENTS; SPEECH; COMPREHENSION; MODELS; SPEAKERS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01858
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In conversation, interlocutors rarely leave long gaps between turns, suggesting that next speakers begin to plan their turns while listening to the previous speaker. The present experiment used analyses of speech onset latencies and eye-movements in a task oriented dialogue paradigm to investigate when speakers start planning their responses. German speakers heard a confederate describe sets of objects in utterances that either ended in a noun [e.g., lch habe eine Tur und ein Fahrrad ("I have a door and a bicycle")] or a verb form [e.g., Ich habe eine Tur und ein Fahrrad besorgt ("I have gotten a door and a bicycle")], while the presence or absence of the final verb either was or was not predictable from the preceding sentence structure. In response, participants had to name any unnamed objects they could see in their own displays with utterances such as lch habe ein El ("I have an egg"). The results show that speakers begin to plan their turns as soon as sufficient information is available to do so, irrespective of further incoming words.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 60 条
[11]   Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal [J].
Barr, Dale J. ;
Levy, Roger ;
Scheepers, Christoph ;
Tily, Harry J. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 68 (03) :255-278
[12]   Analyzing 'visual world' eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression [J].
Barr, Dale J. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 59 (04) :457-474
[13]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[14]  
Boersma P., 2015, PRAAT DOING PHONETIC
[15]   Never Say No ... How the Brain Interprets the Pregnant Pause in Conversation [J].
Bogels, Sara ;
Kendrick, Kobin H. ;
Levinson, Stephen C. .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (12)
[16]   Conversational Interaction in the Scanner: Mentalizing during Language Processing as Revealed by MEG [J].
Bogels, Sara ;
Barr, Dale J. ;
Garrod, Simon ;
Kessler, Klaus .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2015, 25 (09) :3219-3234
[17]   Neural signatures of response planning occur midway through an incoming question in conversation [J].
Bogels, Sara ;
Magyari, Lilla ;
Levinson, Stephen C. .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
[18]   Interference Between Conversation and a Concurrent Visuomotor Task [J].
Boiteau, Timothy W. ;
Malone, Patrick S. ;
Peters, Sara A. ;
Almor, Amit .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2014, 143 (01) :295-311
[19]  
Clark H. H., 1996, USING LANGUAGE
[20]   Projecting the end of a speaker's turn: A cognitive cornerstone of conversation [J].
De Ruiter, J. P. ;
Mitterer, Holger ;
Enfield, N. J. .
LANGUAGE, 2006, 82 (03) :515-535