Implementing patient question-prompt lists into routine cancer care

被引:71
作者
Dimoska, Aneta [1 ]
Butow, Phyllis N. [1 ]
Lynch, Jodi [2 ]
Hovey, Elizabeth [3 ]
Agar, Meera [4 ]
Beale, Philip [5 ]
Tattersall, Martin H. N. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Ctr Med Psychol & Evidence Based Med CeMPED, Sch Psychol, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] St George & Sutherland Hosp, Canc Care Ctr, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
[3] Liverpool Canc Therapy Ctr, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
[4] Braeside Hosp, Prairiewood, NSW, Australia
[5] Concord Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Univ Sydney, Dept Canc Med, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
Question prompt lists; Implementation study; Oncology; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ASKING QUESTIONS; OLDER PATIENTS; BREAST-CANCER; CONSULTATION; PARTICIPATION; SHEET; HELP; COMMUNICATION; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.020
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine the feasibility and acceptability of routine provision of patient question prompt lists (QPLs) to promote patient participation and patient-clinician communication in medical consultations. Methods: Four cancer centres across NSW, Australia (two rural, two urban) were invited to participate, involving distribution of QPLs to patients seeing a medical or radiation oncologist, or palliative care clinician. Patients rated their satisfaction after their next consultation. Cancer specialists provided their views at the end of the study. Results: Sixty-four percent (389/606) of patients attending consultations received a QPL. Of patients offered a QPL (426), 91% accepted. Of 139 patients surveyed post-consultation, 89% reported reading the QPL and, of these, 44% referred to the QPL during the consultation at least once. All of 10 cancer specialists providing their views post-implementation reported that QPL implementation in routine practice was feasible and did not strain resources. Conclusions: Cancer patients and cancer specialists showed support for routine dissemination of the QPL. Practice implications: For successful implementation of evidence-based tools we recommend promotion by local clinical champions, negotiation with clinic staff about dissemination methods, raised patient awareness through on-site project facilitators, media, consumer and support groups, and availability of resources in hard copy and via online sources. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 258
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[21]  
Paci E, 1999, EUR ACAD ANAESTHESIO, V16
[22]   What do we know about facilitating patient communication in the cancer care setting? [J].
Parker, PA ;
Davison, BJ ;
Tishelman, C ;
Brundage, MD .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2005, 14 (10) :848-858
[23]   THE TAKE-HOME MESSAGE - PATIENTS PREFER CONSULTATION AUDIOTAPES TO SUMMARY LETTERS [J].
TATTERSALL, MHN ;
BUTOW, PN ;
GRIFFIN, AM ;
DUNN, SM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (06) :1305-1311
[24]   The promises and pitfalls of evidence-based10.1377/hlthaff.24.1.18 medicine [J].
Timmermans, S ;
Mauck, A .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2005, 24 (01) :18-28
[25]   A consultation leaflet to improve an older patient's involvement in general practice care: a randomized trial [J].
Wetzels, R ;
Wensing, M ;
van Weel, C ;
Grol, R .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2005, 8 (04) :286-294