Faecal near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) compared with other techniques for estimating the in vivo digestibility and dry matter intake of lactating grazing dairy cows

被引:21
作者
Decruyenaere, V. [1 ]
Froidmont, E. [1 ]
Bartiaux-Thill, N. [1 ]
Buldgen, A. [3 ]
Stilmant, D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Walloon Agr Res Ctr CRA W, Prod & Sect Dept, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium
[2] Walloon Agr Res Ctr CRA W, B-6800 Libramont, Belgium
[3] Univ Liege, Anim Sci Unit, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium
关键词
NIRS; Faeces; Estimation; Grass intake; Grass digestibility; CONTROLLED-RELEASE CAPSULES; PREDICT DIGESTIBILITY; HERBAGE INTAKE; FORAGE INTAKE; CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION; CRUDE PROTEIN; DIET QUALITY; NET ENERGY; N-ALKANES; FECES;
D O I
10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.02.005
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to validate near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) applied to faeces (FNIRS) for estimating the grass in vivo organic matter digestibility (G-OMD) and the grass dry matter intake (G-DMI, kg/d) of concentrate-supplemented grazing dairy cows. The G-OMD estimates from one FNIRS model were compared with two estimates using faecal nitrogen indicator (FNI) methods. Similarly, two FNIRS models were compared with the ratio technique (RT) and with three animal performance methods (APM) for estimating G-DMI. The results were analysed at cow and herd level in two grazed paddocks (P1 and P2) in a rotational grazing scheme. For both G-OMD and G-DMI, the DIMS estimations were correlated (P < 0.05) with other predictive methods (r = 0.61 for G-OMD and r = 0.63-0.88 for G-DMI). Depending on the estimation method, the G-OMD varied from 0.689 (FNIRS) to 0.773 (FNI). The FNI estimates were generally higher and were similar to the G-OMD estimates obtained from NIRS analyses of grass sampled in the field. The FNIRS and FNI estimates were biased at cow and paddock level by 0.01-0.1 digestibility units (P < 0.001). Depending on the estimation method, the G-DMI estimates varied from 11.9 to 16.4 kg/d. FNIRS and APM produced similar estimates of G-DMI at both cow and herd level. The RT estimates of G-DMI were 3 kg/d higher than the FNIRS and APM estimates (P < 0.05). The G-DMI estimated by RT methods was particularly high for P2, with a mean value of 18.5 kg/d, which seemed too high in terms of the maximum intake capacity of supplemented grazing dairy cows. For both G-OMD and G-DMI and for all the estimation methods, inter-cow and intra-paddock variations, expressed through the coefficient of variation (SD/mean), ranged from 0.05 to 0.40. As the accuracy of the FNIRS models, expressed through the standard error of cross validation (SECV), was lower than these inter-animal and intra-paddock variations, we suggest that FNIRS could be used to record, quickly and easily, the evolution of grass digestibility and the intake of grazing dairy cows. These estimates could be implemented through decision-support systems aimed at improving the management of grazing dairy herds. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 234
页数:15
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Acamovic T., 1992, MAKING LIGHT WORK AD, P250
[2]  
Adegosan A T., 2000, Field and laboratory methods for grassland and animal production research, P263
[3]  
AFNOR, 1993, V03040 AFNOR NF
[4]  
AFNOR, 1997, V18122 AFNOR NF
[5]  
Andueza D., 2007, 14 emes Recontres autour des recherches sur les ruminants, Paris, les 5 et 6 Decembre 2007, P247
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2001, NATL ACAD SCI
[7]  
Bartiaux-Thill N., 1985, REV AGR, V2, P317
[8]   THE INDIRECT ESTIMATION OF THE DIGESTIBILITY IN CATTLE OF HERBAGE FROM BELGIAN PERMANENT PASTURE [J].
BARTIAUXTHILL, N ;
OGER, R .
GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE, 1986, 41 (03) :269-272
[9]   The accuracy of intake estimation based on the use of alkane controlled-release capsules and faeces grab sampling in cows [J].
Berry, NR ;
Scheeder, MRL ;
Sutter, F ;
Kröber, TF ;
Kreuzer, M .
ANNALES DE ZOOTECHNIE, 2000, 49 (01) :3-13
[10]   PREDICTION OF THE HERBAGE INTAKE OF GRAZING DAIRY-COWS - COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR ESTIMATING HERBAGE DIGESTIBILITY AND FOR FECES SAMPLING [J].
BISTON, R ;
BARTIAUXTHILL, N ;
THEWIS, A ;
FRANCOIS, E ;
LIMBOURG, P ;
GIELEN, M ;
DARDENNE, P .
REPRODUCTION NUTRITION DEVELOPMENT, 1988, 28 :61-62