Examining patient preferences in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis using a discrete-choice approach

被引:70
作者
Alten, Rieke [1 ]
Krueger, Klaus [2 ]
Rellecke, Julian [3 ]
Schiffner-Rohe, Julia [4 ]
Behmer, Olaf [5 ]
Schiffhorst, Guido [3 ]
Nolting, Hans-Dieter [3 ]
机构
[1] Charite, Schlosspk Klin, 2 Heubnerweg, D-14059 Berlin, Germany
[2] Praxiszentrum St Bonifatius, Munich, Germany
[3] IGES Inst GmbH, Berlin, Germany
[4] Pfizer Deutschland GmbH, Berlin, Germany
[5] Pfizer Pharma GmbH, Berlin, Germany
来源
PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE | 2016年 / 10卷
关键词
rheumatoid arthritis; disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; patient preferences; discrete-choice experiment; best-worst scaling; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; BELIEFS; WORST; ADHERENCE; MEDICATION; THERAPIES; INJECTION; MEDICINES;
D O I
10.2147/PPA.S117774
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) used in second-line treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are administered parenterally. However, so-called targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) - developed more recently-offer alternative (ie, oral) administration forms in second-line treatment. Since bDMARDs and tsDMARDs can be regarded as equal in terms of efficacy, the present study examines whether such characteristics as route of administration drive RA patients' treatment choice. This may ultimately suggest superiority of some second-line DMARDs over equally effective options, at least according to RA-patient preferences. Objective: The current study assessed the importance of oral administration among other treatment characteristics differing between available second-line DMARDs for RA patients' preferences using a discrete-choice experiment (DCE). Materials and methods: The DCE involved scenarios of three hypothetical treatment options in a d-efficient design with varying levels of key attributes (route and frequency of administration, time till onset of drug effect, combination therapy, possible side effects), as defined by focus groups. Further patient characteristics were recorded by an accompanying questionnaire. In the DCE, patients were asked to choose best and worst options (best-worst scaling). Results were analyzed by count analysis and adjusted regression analysis. Results: A total of 1,588 subjects completed the DCE and were eligible for final analyses. Across all characteristics included in the DCE, "oral administration" was most desired and "intravenous infusion" was most strongly rejected. This was followed by "no combination with methotrexate" being strongly preferred and "intake every 1-2 weeks" being strongly rejected. On average, levels of route of administration showed strongest influences on patients' decisions in post hoc bootstrapping analysis. Conclusion: According to the results, an oral DMARD that does not have to be combined with methotrexate and is not administered (only) every 1-2 weeks appears a highly favorable treatment option for patients with RA. DMARDs meeting these preferences may increase compliance and adherence in RA treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:2217 / 2228
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Measures: American College of Rheumatology Recommendations for Use in Clinical Practice [J].
Anderson, Jaclyn ;
Caplan, Liron ;
Yazdany, Jinoos ;
Robbins, Mark L. ;
Neogi, Tuhina ;
Michaud, Kaleb ;
Saag, Kenneth G. ;
O'Dell, James R. ;
Kazi, Salahuddin .
ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2012, 64 (05) :640-647
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1972, THEORY OPTIMAL EXPT
[3]   Using best-worst scaling methodology to investigate consumer ethical beliefs across countries [J].
Auger, Pat ;
Devinney, Timothy M. ;
Louviere, Jordan J. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2007, 70 (03) :299-326
[4]   Patient Preferences for Biologic Agents in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Discrete-Choice Experiment [J].
Augustovski, Federico ;
Beratarrechea, Andrea ;
Irazola, Vilma ;
Rubinstein, Fernando ;
Tesolin, Pablo ;
Gonzalez, Juan ;
Lencina, Veronica ;
Scolnik, Marina ;
Waimann, Christian ;
Navarta, David ;
Citera, Gustavo ;
Soriano, Enrique R. .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (02) :385-393
[5]   Patients' problems with new medication for chronic conditions [J].
Barber, N ;
Parsons, J ;
Clifford, S ;
Darracott, R ;
Horne, R .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2004, 13 (03) :172-175
[6]  
Barton JL, 2009, PATIENT PREFER ADHER, V3, P335
[7]   A quantitative assessment of patient barriers to insulin [J].
Casciano, R. ;
Malangone, E. ;
Ramachandran, A. ;
Gagliardino, J. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2011, 65 (04) :408-414
[8]   Treatment choices, preferences and decision-making by patients with rheumatoid arthritis [J].
Chilton, Frances ;
Collett, Raymond A. .
MUSCULOSKELETAL CARE, 2008, 6 (01) :1-14
[9]   Understanding different beliefs held by adherers, unintentional nonadherers, and intentional nonadherers: Application of the Necessity-Concerns Frarnework [J].
Clifford, Sarah ;
Barber, Nick ;
Horne, Rob .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2008, 64 (01) :41-46
[10]   Patients' preference for administration of endocrine treatments by injection or tablets: results from a study of women with breast cancer [J].
Fallowfield, L ;
Atkins, L ;
Catt, S ;
Cox, A ;
Coxon, C ;
Langridge, C ;
Morris, R ;
Price, M .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 (02) :205-210