The use of current risk analysis tools evaluated towards preventing external domino accidents

被引:78
作者
Reniers, GLL
Dullaert, W
Ale, BJM
Soudan, K
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Safety Sci, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands
[2] Univ Antwerp, Dept Environm Technol & Technol Management, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
[3] ITMMA, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
domino accidents; major accidents; risk analysis procedures; risk analysis tools; chemical Seveso industry; risk; domino effects; Seveso directive;
D O I
10.1016/j.jlp.2005.03.001
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Risk analysis is an essential tool for company safety policy. Risk analysis consists of identifying and evaluating all possible risks. The efficiency of risk analysis tools depends on the rigueur of identifying and evaluating all possible risks. The diversity in risk analysis procedures is such that there are many appropriate techniques for any circumstance and the choice has become more a matter of taste. In this paper, we examine the risk analysis tools used by 24 chemical plants in Belgium, mainly located in the port of Antwerp, the second largest chemical cluster in the world after Houston, TX, USA. The aim of this paper is to identify the current practice in the chemical industry subject to European Seveso legislation and to examine how the present methods can be integrated to improve safety policy, especially towards preventing major accidents. Moreover, conclusions on the prevention of catastrophic external domino accidents involving several companies are formulated. This paper also gives impulse to investigating cross-company management implementations concerning external domino accident prevention. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 126
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], GUID HAZ EV PROC
[2]  
BAGSTER DF, 1991, T I CHEM ENG B, V69
[3]  
BAKSTEEN H, 2003, INSTRUMENT DOMINO EF
[4]  
BARAM M, 1998, SAFETY MANAGEMENT CH
[5]  
BOTTELBERGS PHB, 1996, P EUR SEM DOM EFF LE, P36
[6]  
Covello V.T., 1993, RISK ASSESSMENT METH
[7]  
Delvosalle C., 1996, P EUR SEM DOM EFF LE, P5
[8]  
DEPELSMACKER P, 1999, MARKTONDERZOEK METHO
[9]  
Dorman P, 2000, SYSTEMATIC OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY MANAGEMENT, P351
[10]  
Greenberg H. R., 1991, RISK ASSESSMENT RISK