Protection from infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV)-induced immunosuppression by immunization with a fowlpox recombinant containing IBDV-VP2

被引:24
作者
Butter, C [1 ]
Sturman, TDM [1 ]
Baaten, BJG [1 ]
Davison, TF [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Anim Hlth, Div Immunol & Pathol, Newbury RG20 7NN, Berks, England
关键词
D O I
10.1080/03079450310001610686
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Immunosuppression resulting from infectious bursal disease virus ( IBDV) infection has critical health and welfare implications for birds, yet it is incompletely understood and largely overlooked as a measure of vaccine efficacy. The ability of a fowlpoxvirus recombinant (fpIBD1) containing the VP2 protein of IBDV to protect against IBDV-induced immunosuppression was investigated by measuring the convalescent chicken's ability to mount antibody responses to IBDV infection, and to inactivated IBDV and salmonella vaccines. An immunoglobulin (Ig) M response, but no IgG response, occurred after IBDV infection. Uninfected chickens produced a sustained IgM response and some IgG response to inactivated IBDV vaccine, while in previously infected birds only a transient IgM response was detected. A moderate suppression of the response to a commercial salmonella vaccine was evident after IBDV infection, which was largely prevented by immunization with fpIBD1. These results indicate that measurement of immunosuppression could be a useful strategy for assessing the efficacy of vaccines to protect against the consequences of IBDV infection.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 604
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]   INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE [J].
LASHER, HN ;
SHANE, SM .
WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 1994, 50 (02) :133-166
[22]  
Loon A. A. W. M. van, 1994, International symposium on infectious bursal disease and chicken infectious anaemia, Rauischholzhausen, Germany, 21-24 June, 1994., P179
[25]   COMPARISON OF 2 INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VACCINE STRAINS - EFFICACY AND POTENTIAL HAZARDS IN SUSCEPTIBLE AND MATERNALLY IMMUNE BIRDS [J].
MUSKETT, JC ;
HOPKINS, IG ;
EDWARDS, KR ;
THORNTON, DH .
VETERINARY RECORD, 1979, 104 (15) :332-334
[26]   2-5A ACCUMULATES TO HIGH-LEVELS IN INTERFERON-TREATED, VACCINIA VIRUS-INFECTED CELLS IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY INHIBITION OF VIRUS-REPLICATION [J].
RICE, AP ;
ROBERTS, WK ;
KERR, IM .
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, 1984, 50 (01) :220-228
[27]   FLOW CYTOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF B-CELL AND T-CELL SUBPOPULATIONS IN SPECIFIC-PATHOGEN-FREE CHICKENS INFECTED WITH INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS [J].
RODENBERG, J ;
SHARMA, JM ;
BELZER, SW ;
NORDGREN, RM ;
NAQI, S .
AVIAN DISEASES, 1994, 38 (01) :16-21
[28]   COMPARATIVE PATHOGENESIS OF SEROTYPE-1 AND VARIANT SEROTYPE-1 ISOLATES OF INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS AND THEIR EFFECT ON HUMORAL AND CELLULAR IMMUNE COMPETENCE OF SPECIFIC-PATHOGEN-FREE CHICKENS [J].
SHARMA, JM ;
DOHMS, JE ;
METZ, AL .
AVIAN DISEASES, 1989, 33 (01) :112-124
[29]   Protection from IBDV-induced bursal damage by a recombinant fowlpox vaccine, fpIBD1, is dependent on the titre of challenge virus and chicken genotype [J].
Shaw, I ;
Davison, TF .
VACCINE, 2000, 18 (28) :3230-3241
[30]   Fowl adenovirus recombinant expressing VP2 of infectious bursal disease virus induces protective immunity against bursal disease [J].
Sheppard, M ;
Werner, W ;
Tsatas, E ;
McCoy, R ;
Prowse, S ;
Johnson, M .
ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY, 1998, 143 (05) :915-930