Safety and efficacy of mini-margin nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma 4-cm or less

被引:48
作者
Li, Quan-lin [1 ]
Cheng, Liang
Guan, Hong-wei
Zhang, Yue
Wang, Fa-peng
Song, Xi-shuang
机构
[1] Dalian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Urol, Dalian 116011, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.078
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES To explore whether mini-margin nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) is clinically safe and effective for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) of 4 cm or less with a normal contralateral kidney. METHODS A total of 115 patients with sporadic, pathologically confirmed RCC of 4 cm or less (Stage T1a), with a normal contralateral kidney, were treated by NSS using a mini-margin of less than 5 mm from 1998 to 2006. The surgical margin status was evaluated by both frozen and permanent paraffin section studies. The patients were followed up, and the data were analyzed. RESULTS The mean and median tumor diameter was 3.3 and 3.5 cm (range 1.0 to 4.0). None of the patients had positive surgical margins detected at either frozen section or final paraffin section analysis. The mean margin width was 2.2 mm (median 2.0, range 0 to 6). Of the 115 patients, 114 had margins of 5 mm or less (99.1%), 97 (84.3%) had margins of 3 mm or less, and 26 had margins of 0 mm (22.6%). At a mean follow-up of 65 months (median 66, range 9 to 105), all patients were alive. No distant metastasis was detected. Local recurrence was detected in I patient (0.9%) at a different site in the kidney. No major surgical complications, such as hemorrhage or urinary leakage/urinoma requiring reoperation, occurred. Considering only the 97 patients with follow-up of more than 3 years in the analysis, the mean and median follow-up time was 73 and 69 months (range 37 to 105), respectively. All 97 patients were alive with no evidence of disease at the last visit. CONCLUSIONS The results of our study have shown that mini-margin NSS is a safe and effective approach for treating early localized RCC of 4 cm or less.
引用
收藏
页码:924 / 927
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Akçetin Z, 2005, ANTICANCER RES, V25, P1629
[2]   Elective nephron sparing surgery should become standard treatment for small unilateral renal cell carcinoma:: Long-term survival data of 216 patients [J].
Becker, F ;
Siemer, S ;
Humke, U ;
Hack, M ;
Ziegler, M ;
Stöckle, M .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 49 (02) :308-313
[3]   Impact of resection margin status after nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma [J].
Berdjis, Navid ;
Hakenberg, Oliver W. ;
Zastrow, Stefan ;
Oehlschlaeger, Sven ;
Novotny, Vladimir ;
Wirth, Manfred P. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 97 (06) :1208-1210
[4]   Simple enucleation for the treatment of PT1a renal cell carcinoma: Our 20-year experience [J].
Carini, Marco ;
Minervini, Andrea ;
Masieri, Lorenzo ;
Lapini, Alberto ;
Serni, Sergio .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 50 (06) :1263-1271
[5]   Prognostic importance of resection margin width after nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma [J].
Castilla, EA ;
Liou, LS ;
Abrahams, NA ;
Fergany, A ;
Rybicki, LA ;
Myles, J ;
Novick, AC .
UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (06) :993-997
[6]  
Huang WC, 2006, LANCET ONCOL, V7, P735, DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70803-8
[7]  
Lau WKO, 2000, MAYO CLIN PROC, V75, P1236
[8]   Optimal margin in nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma 4 cm or less [J].
Li, QL ;
Guan, HW ;
Zhang, QP ;
Zhang, LZ ;
Wang, FP ;
Liu, YH .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2003, 44 (04) :448-451
[9]   Natural history of chronic renal insufficiency after partial and radical nephrectomy [J].
McKiernan, J ;
Simmons, R ;
Katz, J ;
Russo, P .
UROLOGY, 2002, 59 (06) :816-820
[10]   Laparoscopic and partial nephrectomy [J].
Novick, AC .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 10 (18) :6322S-6327S