Public Safety through Private Action: an Economic Assessment of BIDS

被引:101
作者
Cook, Philip J. [1 ]
MacDonald, John
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Sanford Sch Publ Policy, Durham, NC 27708 USA
关键词
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS; CRIME; REVITALIZATION; PUNISHMENT; SERVICES; BENEFITS; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02419.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Private actions to avoid and prevent criminal victimisation and assist public law enforcement are vital inputs into the crime-control process. One form of private action, the business improvement district (BID), appears particularly promising. A BID is a non-profit organisation created by property owners to provide local public goods, usually including public safety. Our analysis of 30 Los Angeles BIDs demonstrates that the social benefits of BID expenditures on security are a large multiple (about 20) of the private expenditures. Crime displacement appears minimal. Crime reduction in the BID areas has been accompanied by a reduction in arrests, suggesting further savings.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 462
页数:18
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, NEW STRUCTURE POLICI
[2]  
[Anonymous], EVIDENCE BASED CRIME
[3]  
Anselin L., 2003, A Companion to Theoretical Econometrics, P310, DOI [10.1002/9780470996249.ch15, DOI 10.1002/9780470996249.CH15]
[4]   CRIME AND PUNISHMENT - ECONOMIC APPROACH [J].
BECKER, GS .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1968, 76 (02) :169-217
[5]   Privately produced general deterrence [J].
Benson, BL ;
Mast, BD .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2001, 44 (02) :725-746
[6]  
Blumstein Alfred., 2000, CRIME DROP AM
[7]   A government for our time? Business improvement districts and urban governance [J].
Briffault, R .
COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 1999, 99 (02) :365-477
[8]   Volunteering to be taxed: Business improvement districts and the extra-governmental provision of public safety [J].
Brooks, Leah .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2008, 92 (1-2) :388-406
[9]  
Clarke RonaldV., 1983, CRIME JUSTICE, V4, P225, DOI DOI 10.1086/449090
[10]   PRIVATE SECURITY AND PUBLIC SAFETY [J].
CLOTFELTER, CT .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 1978, 5 (03) :388-402