Projection-based statistical inference in linear structural models with possibly weak instruments

被引:77
作者
Dufour, JM
Taamouti, M
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Dept Sci Econ, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, Ctr Interuniv Rech Anal Organ, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, Ctr Interuniv Rech Econ Quantitat, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[4] INSEA, Rabat, Morocco
关键词
simultaneous equations; structural model; instrumental variable; weak instrument; confidence interval; testing; projection; quadric; exact inference; asymptotic theory;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00618.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
It is well known that standard asymptotic theory is not applicable or is very unreliable in models with identification problems or weak instruments. One possible way out consists of using a variant of the Anderson-Rubin ((1949), AR) procedure. The latter allows one to build exact tests and confidence sets only for the full vector of the coefficients of the endogenous explanatory variables in a structural equation, but not for individual coefficients. This problem may in principle be overcome by using projection methods (Dufour (1997), Dufour and Jasiak (2001)). At first sight, however, this technique requires the application of costly numerical algorithms. In this paper, we give a general necessary and sufficient condition that allows one to check whether an AR-type confidence set is bounded. Furthermore, we provide an analytic solution to the problem of building projection-based confidence sets from AR-type confidence sets. The latter involves the geometric properties of "quadrics" and can be viewed as an extension of usual confidence intervals and ellipsoids. Only least squares techniques are needed to build the confidence intervals.
引用
收藏
页码:1351 / 1365
页数:15
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   ESTIMATION OF THE PARAMETERS OF A SINGLE EQUATION IN A COMPLETE SYSTEM OF STOCHASTIC EQUATIONS [J].
ANDERSON, TW ;
RUBIN, H .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1949, 20 (01) :46-63
[2]   Some impossibility theorems in econometrics with applications to structural and dynamic models [J].
Dufour, JM .
ECONOMETRICA, 1997, 65 (06) :1365-1387
[3]   Identification, weak instruments, and statistical inference in econometrics [J].
Dufour, JM .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2003, 36 (04) :767-808
[4]   EXACT TESTS AND CONFIDENCE SETS IN LINEAR REGRESSIONS WITH AUTOCORRELATED ERRORS [J].
DUFOUR, JM .
ECONOMETRICA, 1990, 58 (02) :475-494
[5]   Finite sample limited information inference methods for structural equations and models with generated regressors [J].
Dufour, JM ;
Jasiak, J .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 42 (03) :815-843
[6]  
DUFOUR JM, 2004, FURTHER RESULTS PROJ
[7]   Conditional inference for possibly unidentified structural equations [J].
Forchini, G ;
Hillier, G .
ECONOMETRIC THEORY, 2003, 19 (05) :707-743
[8]   THE NONEXISTENCE OF 100(1 - ALPHA)-PERCENT CONFIDENCE SETS OF FINITE EXPECTED DIAMETER IN ERRORS-IN-VARIABLES AND RELATED MODELS [J].
GLESER, LJ ;
HWANG, JT .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1987, 15 (04) :1351-1362
[9]   Pivotal statistics for testing structural parameters in instrumental variables regression [J].
Kleibergen, F .
ECONOMETRICA, 2002, 70 (05) :1781-1803
[10]  
KLEIBERGEN F, 2001, TESTING SUBSETS STRU