Optimal Design of Block Quay Walls

被引:0
作者
Francois, Stijn [1 ]
Lesage, Louis [1 ]
Verbraken, Hans [1 ,2 ]
Schevenels, Mattias [3 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Struct Mech Sect, Dept Civil Engn, Leuven, Belgium
[2] BESIX, Dept Engn, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Architectural Engn Sect, Dept Architecture, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
shape optimization; quay wall design; construction constraints; block walls; ultimate limit states;
D O I
10.3389/fbuil.2020.00075
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Block walls, consisting of stacked unreinforced prefabricated concrete blocks, are commonly used for the construction of quay walls in the presence of rocky subgrades. A traditional design of block quay walls is based on manual design iterations, envisaging sufficient safety against ultimate limit states (ULS) such as sliding, overturning or loss of bearing capacity of the foundation soil. In addition, the designer should consider stability during the different construction stages of the block wall, referred to as construction constraints. This design process can be laborious, while the resulting designs comprise a large volume of concrete. In order to optimize block quay walls, we developed an automated design procedure in the framework of gradient-based optimization, accounting for the various ULS and construction constraints encountered in engineering practice. The design checks for a block quay wall are first explained in detail. This includes global ULS requirements that apply to the block wall as a whole, and internal ULS requirements to consider sliding and overturning of separate blocks. During all construction stages, the block wall has to be stable, which imposes additional construction constraints. Block walls consisting of rectangular blocks and chamfered blocks are optimized. The resulting designs obtained with the automated design procedure satisfy all design requirements, and have a realistic layout. Furthermore, the influence of the different construction stages is studied, demonstrating the practicality of the proposed automated design procedure.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, P 2 INT C SOFT COMPU, DOI DOI 10.4203/CCP.97.4
[2]  
BSI, 2015, BS8004: Code of Practice for Foundations
[3]   Static and seismic limit equilibrium analysis of sliding retaining walls under different surcharge conditions [J].
Caltabiano, S. ;
Cascone, E. ;
Maugeri, M. .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2012, 37 :38-55
[4]   Design of Retaining Walls Using Big Bang-Big Crunch Optimization [J].
Camp, Charles V. ;
Akin, Alper .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 138 (03) :438-448
[5]   Modelling the dry-contact interface of rigid blocks under torsion and combined loadings: Concavity vs. convexity formulation [J].
Casapulla, C. ;
Maione, Alessandra .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NON-LINEAR MECHANICS, 2018, 99 :86-96
[6]  
Casapulla C., 2019, P INT C COMPUTATIONA, P1, DOI [10.7712/120119.6949.19404, DOI 10.7712/120119.6949.19404]
[7]   Optimization of Pile Groups Using Hybrid Genetic Algorithms [J].
Chan, C. M. ;
Zhang, L. M. ;
Ng, Jenny T. M. .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 135 (04) :497-505
[8]  
de Gijt J., 2015, CIV ENG DIMENS, V17, P179, DOI DOI 10.9744/CED.17.3.179-186
[9]  
de Gijt J. G., 2013, Quay Walls
[10]   Optimization of retaining wall design using evolutionary algorithms [J].
Gandomi, Amir H. ;
Kashani, Ali R. ;
Roke, David A. ;
Mousavi, Mehdi .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2017, 55 (03) :809-825