Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a comprehensive, systematic literature review

被引:11
作者
Campagna, Giuseppe [1 ]
Panico, Giovanni [1 ]
Lombisani, Andrea [1 ]
Vacca, Lorenzo [1 ,4 ]
Caramazza, Daniela [1 ]
Scambia, Giovanni [2 ]
Ercoli, Alfredo [3 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Sci Salute Donna Bambino & Sanit Pubb, UOC Uroginecol & Chirurg Ricostrutt Pavimento Pelv, Rome, Italy
[2] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Sci Salute Donna Bambino & Sanit Pub, UOC Ginecol Oncol, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Messina, Policlin G Martino, PID Ginecol Oncol & Chirurg Ginecol Miniinvas, Messina, Italy
[4] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Sci Salute Donna & Sanit Pubbl, UOC Uroginecol & Chirurg Ricostrutt Pavimento Pel, Largo F Vito 1, I-00168 Rome, Italy
关键词
Urogynecology; Pelvic organ prolapse; Uterosacral ligament suspension; Laparoscopy; Apical suspension; Reconstructive surgery; VAGINAL VAULT SUSPENSION; UTERINE SUSPENSION; PROLAPSE; HYSTERECTOMY; REPAIR; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.006
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension (LUSLS) of the vaginal apex for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has gained popularity. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate perioperative outcomes and complications, subjective and objective success rates and recurrence rates in women undergoing this surgical procedure.Study Design: A systematic literature search was performed in December 2021. The critical appraisal skills pro-gram (CASP) was used to assess the methodological quality of the selected studies. The Clavien-Dindo (CD) scale and the Satava scale were used to classify periprocedural complications. Continuous variables were described as means and standard deviations while categorical were expressed as percentages of the whole group. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.Results: 26 articles were selected and analysed, with a total population of 1401 patients. Anatomical and sub-jective success rates after LUSLS ranged from 79% and 100% and from 76.2% to 100% respectively. The re -operation rate varied from 2% to 4.5% in the largest cohorts. The overall complication rate was 13.6%, how-ever grade III CD complications occurred only in 1% of patients. Ureteral complications were described in only 2 cases.Conclusions: LUSLS represent a safe and effective technique for vaginal apex resuspension in women with POP. Further larger prospective randomized studies are required to confirm these data.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 70
页数:14
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Urogynecologic Surgical Mesh Implants |
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Critical Appraisal Skills Programme
[3]   Bilateral uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension with site-specific endopelvic fascia defect repair for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse [J].
Barber, MD ;
Visco, AG ;
Weidner, AC ;
Amundsen, CL ;
Bump, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 183 (06) :1402-1410
[4]   Ureteral Compromise in Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension A Retrospective Cohort [J].
Barbier, Heather M. ;
Smith, Margo Z. ;
Eto, Chidimma U. ;
Welgoss, Jeffrey A. ;
Von Pechmann, Walter ;
Horbach, Nicolette ;
Gruber, Daniel D. .
Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, 2015, 21 (06) :363-368
[5]  
Burak S, 2020, ANATOMICAL OUTCOMES, DOI [10.34057/PPj.2020.39.03.002, DOI 10.34057/PPJ.2020.39.03.002]
[6]   National Analysis of Perioperative Morbidity of Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at the Time of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension [J].
Chapman, Graham C. ;
Slopnick, Emily A. ;
Roberts, Kasey ;
Sheyn, David ;
Wherley, Susan ;
Mahajan, Sangeeta T. ;
Pollard, Robert R. .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (02) :275-281
[7]   Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension versus vaginal colposuspension using the Uphold Lite™ mesh system: clinical outcome and patient satisfaction [J].
Chill, Henry H. ;
Gutman-Ido, Einat ;
Navon, Ido ;
Reuveni-Salzman, Adi ;
Haj-Yahya, Rani ;
Shveiky, David .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 32 (06) :1513-1518
[8]   Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J].
Dindo, D ;
Demartines, N ;
Clavien, PA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :205-213
[9]   Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament uterine suspension compared with vaginal hysterectomy with vaginal vault suspension for uterovaginal prolapse [J].
Diwan, A ;
Rardin, CR ;
Strohsnitter, WC ;
Weld, A ;
Rosenblatt, P ;
Kohli, N .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2006, 17 (01) :79-83
[10]   Modified Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in Patients with Gynecologic Tumors and Advanced Uterovaginal Prolapse [J].
Favero, Giovanni ;
Baessler, Kaven ;
Haddad, Jorge ;
Pfiffer, Tatiana ;
Baracat, Edmund Chada ;
Carvalho, Jesus Paula ;
Bortolini, Maria Augusta .
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 2016, 32 (01) :24-28