Methodological challenges surrounding QALY estimation for paediatric economic evaluation

被引:19
作者
Petrou, Stavros [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Radcliffe Observ Quarter, Woodstock Rd, Oxford OX2 6GG, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
QALYs; Quality-adjusted life years; Paediatrics; Childhood; Methods; Valuation; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HEALTH-STATUS; ADOLESCENCE; VALIDITY; WEIGHTS;
D O I
10.1186/s12962-022-00345-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Cost-utility analysis remains the preferred form of economic evaluation for health technology assessment, pricing and reimbursement authorities in several countries. The results of cost-utility analyses are commonly expressed in terms of incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained where the QALY combines length of life and health-related quality of life in a single metric. This commentary provides an overview of key methodological challenges surrounding QALY estimation for paediatric economic evaluation. These challenges include issues surrounding the relevant attributes to incorporate into measurement instruments, appropriate respondents for the measurement and valuation tasks, perspectives adopted when completing valuation tasks, potential sources of bias in the description and valuation processes, and the paucity of psychometric evidence for existing measures. In addition, the commentary considers methodological challenges raised by research aimed at assessing whether a QALY gain by a child should be valued equally to a QALY gain by an adult.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Age Differences in the Value of Statistical Life: Revealed Preference Evidence [J].
Aldy, Joseph E. ;
Viscusi, W. Kip .
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2007, 1 (02) :241-260
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies: Canada, V4th
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, C-PACE Program Guidelines
[6]   Quality of life in pre-adolescence: A 17-dimensional health-related measure (17D) [J].
Apajasalo, M ;
Rautonen, J ;
Holmberg, C ;
Sinkkonen, J ;
Aalberg, V ;
Pihko, H ;
Siimes, MA ;
Kaitila, I ;
Makela, A ;
Erkkila, K ;
Sintonen, H .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1996, 5 (06) :532-538
[7]   Quality of life in early adolescence: A sixteen-dimensional health-related measure (16D) [J].
Apajasalo, M ;
Sintonen, H ;
Holmberg, C ;
Sinkkonen, J ;
Aalberg, V ;
Pihko, H ;
Siimes, MA ;
Kaitila, I ;
Makela, A ;
Rantakari, K ;
Anttila, R ;
Rautonen, J .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1996, 5 (02) :205-211
[8]   How are Child-Specific Utility Instruments Used in Decision Making in Australia? A Review of Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee Public Summary Documents [J].
Bailey, Cate ;
Dalziel, Kim ;
Cronin, Paula ;
Devlin, Nancy ;
Viney, Rosalie .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2022, 40 (02) :157-182
[9]   Weighting and valuing quality-adjusted life-years using stated preference methods: preliminary results from the Social Value of a QALY Project [J].
Baker, R. ;
Bateman, I. ;
Donaldson, C. ;
Jones-Lee, M. ;
Lancsar, E. ;
Loomes, G. ;
Mason, H. ;
Odejar, M. ;
Prades, J. L. Pinto ;
Robinson, A. ;
Ryan, M. ;
Shackley, P. ;
Smith, R. ;
Sugden, R. ;
Wildman, J. .
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2010, 14 (27) :1-+
[10]   Development of the multi-attribute Adolescent Health Utility Measure (AHUM) [J].
Beusterien, Kathleen M. ;
Yeung, Jean-Ezra ;
Pang, Francis ;
Brazier, John .
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2012, 10