Emergy analysis of biogas production and electricity generation from small-scale agricultural digesters

被引:81
作者
Ciotola, Richard J. [1 ]
Lansing, Stephanie [2 ]
Martin, Jay F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Food Agr & Biol Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Environm Sci & Technol, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
Anaerobic digestion; Manure; Costa Rica; Renewable energy; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; NATURAL-GAS; SUSTAINABILITY; TRANSFORMITY; SYSTEMS; ENERGY; INDEXES; OIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.06.031
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
An emergy analysis was performed to assess the relative sustainability and environmental impact of small-scale energy production using Taiwanese model plug-flow anaerobic digesters to treat livestock manure in Costa Rica. Emergy analysis quantifies all inputs to a system by converting them to solar energy equivalents, thus allowing for direct comparison of the diverse inputs of renewable energies, human labor and economic goods needed to construct and maintain anaerobic digestion systems. The digesters were located on the campus of EARTH University, Costa Rica, and the biogas was utilized to power a 40 kW generator that supplies electricity for farm operations. Separate emergy analyses were performed for the biogas production and the combination of biogas production and generation of electricity. Manure was the largest input in both analyses, accounting for 85.3% of the annual emergy input for biogas production and 66.9% for electricity generation from the biogas. The fraction of emergy inputs from renewable sources (OR) was 66% for biogas production and 52% for electricity generation from the biogas. The transformities of biogas and electricity generation from the biogas were 5.23E+04 sej/J and 1.01E+06 sej/J respectively. The emergy yield ratios (EYR) were 2.93 for biogas production and 2.07 for electricity generation indicating that these digesters efficiently match purchased resources and renewable energies to produce energy from livestock manure. The generation of electricity from the biogas resulted in a decrease in the emergy sustainability index (ESI) from 5.67 to 2.22 and an increase in the environmental loading ratio (ELR) from 0.52 to 0.93. Using a generator to convert the biogas to electricity does decrease the sustainability of the system, largely due to the high emergy value associated with the electrical generation equipment and machinery, but these results demonstrate that the production of biogas and the generation of electricity from Taiwanese model digesters in Costa Rica are environmentally sustainable processes that result in the production of energy that is largely dependent on renewable and recycled energies. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1681 / 1691
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Transforming tropical rivers: an environmental perspective on hydropower development in Costa Rica [J].
Anderson, Elizabeth P. ;
Pringle, Catherine M. ;
Rojas, Manrique .
AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2006, 16 (07) :679-693
[2]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[3]  
[Anonymous], Engineering Toolbox, Wood Densities
[4]  
Archer D.B., 1990, Anaerobic Digestion: A Waste Treatment Technology. Critical Reports on Applied Chemistry, P43
[5]  
*ASTM, A653A653M09A ASTM
[6]   Comparison of thermodynamic and environmental indexes of natural gas, syngas and hydrogen production processes [J].
Bargigli, S ;
Raugei, M ;
Ulgiati, S .
ENERGY, 2004, 29 (12-15) :2145-2159
[7]   The problem of co-production in environmental accounting by energy analysis [J].
Bastianoni, S ;
Marchettini, N .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2000, 129 (2-3) :187-193
[8]   The solar transformity of oil and petroleum natural gas [J].
Bastianoni, SB ;
Campbell, D ;
Susani, L ;
Tiezzi, E .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2005, 186 (02) :212-220
[9]   Global oil & gas depletion: an overview [J].
Bentley, RW .
ENERGY POLICY, 2002, 30 (03) :189-205
[10]   EMergy analysis perspectives of Thailand and Mekong river dam proposals [J].
Brown, MT ;
McClanahan, TR .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 1996, 91 (1-3) :105-130