Facial soft tissue profile following bimaxillary orthognathic surgery

被引:55
作者
Altug-Atac, Ayse Tuba [1 ]
Bollatoglu, Halise [1 ]
Memikoglu, Ufuk Toygar [1 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Univ, Dis Hekimligi Fak, Ortodont Anabilim Dali, TR-06500 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
class III malocclusion; orthognathic surgery; cephalometrics; digital planimeter;
D O I
10.2319/122206-525.1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the changes in the position and area of nasal and labial soft tissues in adult skeletal Class III patients who underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Materials and Methods: Pretreatment (T1), preoperative (T2), and posttreatment (T3) cephalometric variables and upper-lower lip areas were measured on lateral cephalometric radiographs for 20 individuals (9 male, 11 female; mean age 21.3 years at T1, 22.4 years at T2, and 23.4 years at T3) who had maxillary advancement and mandibular setback. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan tests were used to compare the cephalometric and area measurements at the beginning of treatment, and at presurgery and postsurgery, respectively. Paired t-tests were also performed to analyze changes within the periods. Results: The tip of the nose was affected less with the movement of the underlying skeletal structure (0.25%), while the soft tissue B point (B') moved equally with the skeletal B point. As the maxilla related variables increased due to the forward movement, the upper labial areas decreased. With the backward movement of the mandible, the middle and inferior lower labial areas increased, while the superior lower labial area decreased. Conclusions: The results of our study suggest that the dramatic improvement in the facial profiles of the bimaxillary surgery patients is primarily related to the backward movement of the mandible and the significant reduction in the superior lower lip area.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 57
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Bailey L J, 1996, Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, V11, P7
  • [2] Bays RA, 1997, PRINICPLES ORAL MAXI, P1373
  • [3] LIP POSTURE AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE IN TREATMENT PLANNING
    BURSTONE, CJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1967, 53 (04): : 262 - &
  • [4] Chew MT, 2005, ANGLE ORTHOD, V75, P959
  • [5] DANN JJ, 1976, J ORAL SURG, V34, P19
  • [6] How predictable is orthognathic surgery?
    Eckhardt, CE
    Cunningham, SJ
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2004, 26 (03) : 303 - 309
  • [7] Enacar A, 1999, Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, V14, P27
  • [8] EPKER BN, 1986, DENTOFACIAL DEFORMIT, V1, P492
  • [9] Changes in soft tissue profile after sagittal split ramus osteotomy and retropositioning of the mandible
    Gaggl, A
    Schultes, G
    Kärcher, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1999, 57 (05) : 542 - 546
  • [10] SOFT-TISSUE AND DENTOSKELETAL PROFILE CHANGES ASSOCIATED WITH MANDIBULAR SETBACK OSTEOTOMY
    GJORUP, H
    ATHANASIOU, AE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1991, 100 (04) : 312 - 323