Quantitative Evaluation of Image Mosaicing in Multiple Scene Categories

被引:0
作者
Ghosh, Debabrata [1 ]
Park, Sangho [1 ]
Kaabouch, Naima [1 ]
Semke, William
Fevig, Ronald A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Dakota, Dept Elect Engn, Grand Forks, ND 58203 USA
[2] Univ N Dakota, Dept Mech Engn, Grand Forks, ND 58203 USA
来源
IMAGE PROCESSING: ALGORITHMS AND SYSTEMS X AND PARALLEL PROCESSING FOR IMAGING APPLICATIONS II | 2012年 / 8295卷
关键词
Mosaicing Algorithms; SIFT; RANSAC; Evaluation; Metrics; Percentage of Mismatches; Difference of Pixel Intensities; Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio; Mutual Information; REGISTRATION;
D O I
10.1117/12.909356
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Image mosaicing has been practiced in several computer vision and scientific research areas. There is a clear indication of the advancement of the state of the art of mosaicing algorithms. However, the methods of quantitative evaluation of mosaicing algorithms are still inadequate. Furthermore, a majority of the previous evaluation methodologies lack a sufficient number of performance metrics, while others suffer from computational complication. Therefore, this paper proposes an evaluation method to assess the performance of mosaicing algorithms. This method involves four metrics: percentage of mismatches, difference of pixel intensities, peak signal-to-noise ratio, and mutual information to measure the quality of the mosaicing outputs. These outputs are obtained using a mosaicing algorithm based on the Scale Invariant Feature Transform, Best Bins First, and Random Sample Consensus, reprojection and stitching algorithms. In order to evaluate mosaicing performance objectively, the proposed method compares mosaicing images with the ground-truth images that depict the same scene view. Evaluation has been performed using 36 test sequences from 3 different categories: images of 2D surfaces, images of outdoor 3D scenes, and airborne images from an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Exhaustive testing has shown that the proposed metrics are effective in assessing the quality of mosaicing outputs.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Azzari P, 2008, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5259, P89, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-88458-3_9
[2]  
Boutellier B., 2009, COMPUTER VISION COMP, P107
[3]  
Guangfu Ma, 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Information and Automation (ICIA 2010), P2306, DOI 10.1109/ICINFA.2010.5512428
[4]  
Hu S., 2006, WORLD C INT CONTR AU, P10361
[5]  
Iiyoshi Takeaki, 2008, SICE 2008 - 47th Annual Conference of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan, P572, DOI 10.1109/SICE.2008.4654721
[6]  
Jinpeng W., 2011, INT C MULT SIGN PROC, P207
[7]   Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints [J].
Lowe, DG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER VISION, 2004, 60 (02) :91-110
[8]  
Luo RW, 2008, 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUDIO, LANGUAGE AND IMAGE PROCESSING, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, P582, DOI 10.1109/ICALIP.2008.4590033
[9]   Mosaicing of bladder endoscopic image sequences: Distortion calibration and registration algorithm [J].
Miranda-Luna, Rosebet ;
Daul, Christian ;
Blondel, Walter C. P. M. ;
Hemandez-Mier, Yahir ;
Wolf, Didier ;
Guillemin, Francois .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 55 (02) :541-553
[10]  
Peng Kang, 2011, 2011 International Conference on Multimedia Technology, P155