A two-stage approach for structural topology optimization

被引:33
|
作者
Lin, CY [1 ]
Chou, JN [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Taipei 10672, Taiwan
关键词
topology optimization; homogenization; material distribution; two-stage approach; sequential linear programming;
D O I
10.1016/S0965-9978(98)00081-7
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a two-stage optimization algorithm for topology optimization based on the homogenization method. The multistage approach aims to increase the stability and overall efficiency of homogenization-based topology optimizations. The homogenization method employed in this study uses a material constraint, which seeks the optimal configuration with the least amount of compliance. In a two-stage approach, a finite element model with a large element size was employed in the first stage of the topology optimization. The purpose of using a smaller number of finite elements is to increase the chances of attaining a good topology while the associated computational cost is limited. At the end of the first optimization stage, the optimal topology obtained is subsequently used to construct an initial topology in a finite element model with a smaller element size. The second-stage topology optimization is thus performed with the goal of capturing a topology of good quality with detailed contour description. A number of smoothing strategies for converting the optimal topology into the initial topology in a finer FEM model space are entailed. The stability and effectiveness of the proposed two-stage topology optimization algorithm are illustrated by two structural design problems. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 271
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrating moving morphable components and plastic layout optimization: a two-stage approach for enhanced structural topology optimization
    Lotfalian, Amin
    Esmaeilpour, Peyman
    Yoon, Gil Ho
    Takalloozadeh, Meisam
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2025, 68 (02)
  • [2] A Two-stage Optimization Approach for Structural Dynamic Design of Mechanical Systems
    Qin, Xianrong
    Shen, Junjie
    Zhang, Jianjie
    Li, Yongfeng
    Zhang, Qing
    MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING AND AUTOMATION I, PTS 1-3, 2011, 139-141 : 2401 - 2404
  • [3] A Two-Stage Coevolution Approach for Constrained Optimization
    Ji, Jing-Yu
    Yu, Wei-Jie
    Zhang, Jun
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE COMPANION (GECCO'17 COMPANION), 2017, : 167 - 168
  • [4] Deep-learning-based two-stage approach for real-time explicit topology optimization
    Sun S.-Y.
    Cheng W.-B.
    Zhang H.-Z.
    Deng X.-P.
    Qi H.
    Jilin Daxue Xuebao (Gongxueban)/Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53 (10): : 2942 - 2951
  • [5] Dual Approach for Two-Stage Robust Nonlinear Optimization
    de Ruiter, Frans J. C. T.
    Zhen, Jianzhe
    den Hertog, Dick
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2023, 71 (05) : 1794 - 1799
  • [6] Optimization of aortic arch replacement: Two-stage approach
    Safi, Hazim J.
    Miller, Charles C., III
    Estrera, Anthony L.
    Villa, Martin A.
    Goodrick, Jennifer S.
    Porat, Eyal
    Azizzadeh, Ali
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2007, 83 (02): : S815 - S818
  • [7] Two-Stage robust optimization problems with two-stage uncertainty
    Goerigk, Marc
    Lendl, Stefan
    Wulf, Lasse
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 302 (01) : 62 - 78
  • [8] A two-stage resilience promotion approach for urban rail transit networks based on topology enhancement and recovery optimization
    Xu, Chen
    Xu, Xueguo
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2024, 635
  • [9] A two-stage structural optimization-based design procedure of structural systems
    Sotiropoulos, Stefanos
    Lagaros, Nikos D.
    STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2022, 31 (03):
  • [10] A two-stage optimization approach for sulphur emission regulation compliance
    Patricksson, Oyvind
    Erikstad, Stein Ove
    MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, 2017, 44 (01) : 94 - 111