Feasibility and cost effectiveness of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A retrospective cohort study

被引:18
作者
Manzia, Tommaso Maria [1 ]
Quaranta, Claudia [1 ]
Filingeri, Vincenzino [1 ]
Toti, Luca [1 ]
Anselmo, Alessandro [1 ]
Tariciotti, Laura [1 ]
De Carolis, Gerardo
Cacciola, Roberto [1 ,2 ]
Di Lorenzo, Nicola [1 ]
Sorge, Roberto [3 ]
Angelico, Roberta [1 ]
Monteleone, Giovanni [4 ]
Tisone, Giuseppe [1 ]
机构
[1] Tor Vergata Univ Rome, Fdn PTV, Dept Surg, HPB & Transplant Unit, Rome, Italy
[2] Fdn PTV, Hlth Management, Rome, Italy
[3] Tor Vergata Univ Rome, Dept Syst Med, Lab Biometry, Rome, Italy
[4] Tor Vergata Univ Rome, Dept Syst Med, Rome, Italy
来源
ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY | 2020年 / 55卷
关键词
Ambulatory; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Cost evaluation; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.amsu.2020.04.036
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Ambulatory surgery is an efficient, safe and widely performed procedure; this study would shows the advantages of the ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure from the point of view of patients and the Hospital/National Health System. Materials and Methods: Single-center retrospective cohort study including 288 patients who underwent laparoscopic-cholecystectomy at **** from January 2016 to July 2018. Ambulatory LC were compared to well-matched inpatient procedures performed in the same study period. The primary endpoints was the 30-day readmission rate. Secondary endpoints were the discharge rate in the ambulatory group, the post-operative complications rate and cost effectiveness. Results: 120/288 (41.7%) patients underwent ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Thirty-two (26.7%) patients who underwent ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy had major preoperative comorbidities and 35 (29.2%) had undergone prior abdominal surgery. The readmission rates for ambulatory patients and inpatients were 0.8% and 1.7% (p = 0.56), respectively; 104 (86.7%) ambulatory patients were discharged successfully on the same day. The two groups showed the same post-operative complication rate (p = 0.40). Ambulatory procedures resulted in related cost savings of more than 300% for the hospital and a remarkable financial benefit for the National Italian Healthcare System, accounting for savings exceeding (sic) 27 000 per year. Conclusions: Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and cost effective. Since a third of ambulatory patients showed comorbidity or previous abdominal surgery, we believe that this procedure may be performed safely in a tertiary HPB centre, even in complex patients.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 61
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] STROCSS 2019 Guideline: Strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery
    Agha, Riaz
    Abdall-Razak, Ali
    Crossley, Eleanor
    Dowlut, Naeem
    Iosifidis, Christos
    Mathew, Ginimol
    Beamishaj
    Bashashati, Mohammad
    Millham, Frederick H.
    Orgill, Dennis P.
    Noureldin, Ashraf
    James, Iain
    Alsawadi, Abdulrahman
    Bradley, Patrick J.
    Giordano, Salvatore
    Laskin, Daniel M.
    Basu, Somprakas
    Johnston, Maximilian
    Muensterer, Oliver J.
    Mukherjee, Indraneil
    Chi-Yong, James Ngu
    Valmasoni, Michele
    Pagano, Duilio
    Vasudevan, Baskaran
    Rosin, Richard David
    McCaul, James Anthony
    Albrecht, Jorg
    Hoffman, Jerome R.
    Thorat, Mangesh A.
    Massarut, Samuele
    Thoma, Achilles
    Kirshtein, Boris
    Afifi, Raafat Yahia
    Farooq, Naheed
    Challacombe, Ben
    Pai, Prathamesh S.
    Perakath, Benjamin
    Kadioglu, Huseyin
    Aronson, Jeffrey K.
    Raveendran, Kandiah
    Machado-Aranda, David
    Klappenbach, Roberto
    Healy, Donagh
    Miguel, Diana
    Leles, Claudio Rodrigues
    Ather, M. Hammad
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 72 : 156 - 165
  • [2] Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: consensus conference-based guidelines
    Agresta, Ferdinando
    Campanile, Fabio Cesare
    Vettoretto, Nereo
    Silecchia, Gianfranco
    Bergamini, Carlo
    Maida, Pietro
    Lombari, Pietro
    Narilli, Piero
    Marchi, Domenico
    Carrara, Alessandro
    Esposito, Maria Grazia
    Fiume, Stefania
    Miranda, Giuseppe
    Barlera, Simona
    Davoli, Marina
    [J]. LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2015, 400 (04) : 429 - 453
  • [3] A meta-analysis of ambulatory versus inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Ahmad, N. Z.
    Byrnes, G.
    Naqvi, S. A.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (09): : 1928 - 1934
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2014, GALLST DIS DIAGN MAN
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2000, NHS PLAN PLAN INV PL
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2014, NAT REF COSTS 2013 2
  • [7] Arregui M E, 1991, Surg Laparosc Endosc, V1, P240
  • [8] Cassinotti E, 2008, Int J Surg, V6 Suppl 1, pS93, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.12.012
  • [9] Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Gurusamy, K.
    Junnarkar, S.
    Farouk, M.
    Davidson, B. R.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 95 (02) : 161 - 168
  • [10] A prospective study of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy - Training economic, and patient benefits
    Jain, PK
    Hayden, JD
    Sedman, PC
    Royston, CMS
    O'Boyle, CJ
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (08): : 1082 - 1085